| | | | | | |

Ryzen 7 2700X vs Core i7-12700H


Description
The 2700X is based on Zen+ architecture while the i7-12700H is based on Alder Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2700X gets a score of 431.1 k points while the i7-12700H gets 643.3 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-12700H is 1.5 times faster than the 2700X. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
800f82
906a3
Core
Pinnacle Ridge
Alder Lake-H
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.7 GHz
4.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.3 GHz
4.7 GHz
Socket
AM4
BGA 1744
Cores/Threads
8/16
14/20
TDP
105 W
115 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x64+8x32 kB
6x32/8x64+6x48/8x32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
6x1280+6x2048 kB
Cache L3
16384 kB
24576 kB
Date
April 2018
January 2022
Mean monothread perf.
64.83k points
93.12k points
Mean multithread perf.
431.14k points
643.29k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
2700X
i7-12700H
Test#1 (Integers)
4.25k
7.95k (x1.87)
Test#2 (FP)
19.72k
19.74k (x1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.84k
13.29k (x2.28)
Test#1 (Memory)
21.36k
14.97k (x0.7)
TOTAL
51.17k
55.95k (x1.09)

Multithread

2700X

i7-12700H
Test#1 (Integers)
35.04k
53.64k (x1.53)
Test#2 (FP)
181.42k
171.15k (x0.94)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
64.86k
94.92k (x1.46)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.21k
9.24k (x1.13)
TOTAL
289.54k
328.95k (x1.14)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
2700X
i7-12700H
Test#1 (Integers)
15.22k
24.26k (x1.59)
Test#2 (FP)
24.12k
24.03k (x1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.87k
14.75k (x2.51)
Test#1 (Memory)
21k
12.08k (x0.58)
TOTAL
66.21k
75.12k (x1.13)

Multithread

2700X

i7-12700H
Test#1 (Integers)
126.81k
199.99k (x1.58)
Test#2 (FP)
229.86k
218.01k (x0.95)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
61.74k
102.62k (x1.66)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.77k
9.42k (x0.96)
TOTAL
428.19k
530.04k (x1.24)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
2700X
i7-12700H
Test#1 (Integers)
14.44k
25.81k (x1.79)
Test#2 (FP)
24.92k
26.18k (x1.05)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.8k
14.71k (x2.53)
Test#1 (Memory)
19.07k
13.88k (x0.73)
TOTAL
64.24k
80.58k (x1.25)

Multithread

2700X

i7-12700H
Test#1 (Integers)
122.01k
203.61k (x1.67)
Test#2 (FP)
220.34k
249.64k (x1.13)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
59.89k
101.32k (x1.69)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.9k
9.55k (x0.97)
TOTAL
412.13k
564.12k (x1.37)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
2700X
i7-12700H
Test#1 (Integers)
15.34k
41.64k (x2.71)
Test#2 (FP)
25.75k
25.48k (x0.99)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.79k
13.2k (x2.28)
Test#1 (Memory)
17.95k
12.8k (x0.71)
TOTAL
64.83k
93.12k (x1.44)

Multithread

2700X

i7-12700H
Test#1 (Integers)
123.07k
276.56k (x2.25)
Test#2 (FP)
239.3k
251.6k (x1.05)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
60.6k
104.55k (x1.73)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.18k
10.58k (x1.29)
TOTAL
431.14k
643.29k (x1.49)

Performance/W
2700X
i7-12700H
Test#1 (Integers)
1172 points/W
2405 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2279 points/W
2188 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
577 points/W
909 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
78 points/W
92 points/W
TOTAL
4106 points/W
5594 points/W

Performance/GHz
2700X
i7-12700H
Test#1 (Integers)
3568 points/GHz
8859 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5987 points/GHz
5422 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1347 points/GHz
2808 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
4175 points/GHz
2724 points/GHz
TOTAL
15078 points/GHz
19813 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4