Ryzen 7 2700X vs Core i5-12400F
Description
The 2700X is based on Zen+ architecture while the i5-12400F is based on Alder Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2700X gets a score of 431.1 k points while the i5-12400F gets 399.4 k points.
Summarizing, the 2700X is 1.1 times faster than the i5-12400F. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2700X gets a score of 431.1 k points while the i5-12400F gets 399.4 k points.
Summarizing, the 2700X is 1.1 times faster than the i5-12400F. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
800f82
90675
Core
Pinnacle Ridge
Alder Lake-S
Base frecuency
3.7 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.3 GHz
4.4 GHz
Socket
AM4
LGA 1700
Cores/Threads
8/16
6/12
TDP
105 W
117 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x64+8x32 kB
6x32/0x64+6x48/0x32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
6x1280+0x2048 kB
Cache L3
16384 kB
18432 kB
Date
April 2018
January 2022
Mean monothread perf.
64.83k points
76.46k points
Mean multithread perf.
431.14k points
399.39k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
2700X
i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
4.25k
7.43k (x1.75)
Test#2 (FP)
19.72k
18.64k (x0.95)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.84k
13.15k (x2.25)
Test#1 (Memory)
21.36k
14.82k (x0.69)
TOTAL
51.17k
54.04k (x1.06)
Multithread
2700X
i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
35.04k
36.23k (x1.03)
Test#2 (FP)
181.42k
134.76k (x0.74)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
64.86k
84.06k (x1.3)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.21k
16.71k (x2.04)
TOTAL
289.54k
271.76k (x0.94)
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
2700X
i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
15.22k
24.18k (x1.59)
Test#2 (FP)
24.12k
23.85k (x0.99)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.87k
14.42k (x2.46)
Test#1 (Memory)
21k
14.87k (x0.71)
TOTAL
66.21k
77.32k (x1.17)
Multithread
2700X
i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
126.81k
122.98k (x0.97)
Test#2 (FP)
229.86k
168.77k (x0.73)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
61.74k
96.11k (x1.56)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.77k
16.32k (x1.67)
TOTAL
428.19k
404.19k (x0.94)
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
2700X
i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
14.44k
24.24k (x1.68)
Test#2 (FP)
24.92k
24.74k (x0.99)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.8k
13.95k (x2.4)
Test#1 (Memory)
19.07k
14.47k (x0.76)
TOTAL
64.24k
77.41k (x1.21)
Multithread
2700X
i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
122.01k
126.87k (x1.04)
Test#2 (FP)
220.34k
186.48k (x0.85)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
59.89k
92.37k (x1.54)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.9k
15.45k (x1.56)
TOTAL
412.13k
421.18k (x1.02)
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
2700X
i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
15.34k
33.85k (x2.21)
Test#2 (FP)
25.75k
20.33k (x0.79)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.79k
10.51k (x1.81)
Test#1 (Memory)
17.95k
11.77k (x0.66)
TOTAL
64.83k
76.46k (x1.18)
Multithread
2700X
i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
123.07k
174.21k (x1.42)
Test#2 (FP)
239.3k
141.31k (x0.59)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
60.6k
64.86k (x1.07)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.18k
19.01k (x2.32)
TOTAL
431.14k
399.39k (x0.93)
Performance/W
2700X
i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
1172 points/W
1489 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2279 points/W
1208 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
577 points/W
554 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
78 points/W
162 points/W
TOTAL
4106 points/W
3414 points/W
Performance/GHz
2700X
i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
3568 points/GHz
7693 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5987 points/GHz
4621 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1347 points/GHz
2389 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
4175 points/GHz
2675 points/GHz
TOTAL
15078 points/GHz
17378 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4