Ryzen 7 2700X vs Core i5-1235U
Description
The 2700X is based on Zen+ architecture while the i5-1235U is based on Alder Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2700X gets a score of 431.1 k points while the i5-1235U gets 297.5 k points.
Summarizing, the 2700X is 1.4 times faster than the i5-1235U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2700X gets a score of 431.1 k points while the i5-1235U gets 297.5 k points.
Summarizing, the 2700X is 1.4 times faster than the i5-1235U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
800f82
906a4
Core
Pinnacle Ridge
Alder Lake-U
Base frecuency
3.7 GHz
3.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.3 GHz
4.4 GHz
Socket
AM4
BGA 1700
Cores/Threads
8/16
10/12
TDP
105 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x64+8x32 kB
2x32/8x64+2x48/8x32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
1x1280+4x2048 kB
Cache L3
16384 kB
12288 kB
Date
April 2018
April 2022
Mean monothread perf.
64.83k points
81.64k points
Mean multithread perf.
431.14k points
297.46k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
2700X
i5-1235U
Test#1 (Integers)
4.25k
7.33k (x1.72)
Test#2 (FP)
19.72k
18.27k (x0.93)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.84k
12.8k (x2.19)
Test#1 (Memory)
21.36k
13.2k (x0.62)
TOTAL
51.17k
51.61k (x1.01)
Multithread
2700X
i5-1235U
Test#1 (Integers)
35.04k
29.24k (x0.83)
Test#2 (FP)
181.42k
83.32k (x0.46)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
64.86k
54.53k (x0.84)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.21k
4.99k (x0.61)
TOTAL
289.54k
172.07k (x0.59)
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
2700X
i5-1235U
Test#1 (Integers)
15.22k
23.53k (x1.55)
Test#2 (FP)
24.12k
23.51k (x0.97)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.87k
14.71k (x2.51)
Test#1 (Memory)
21k
13.24k (x0.63)
TOTAL
66.21k
74.99k (x1.13)
Multithread
2700X
i5-1235U
Test#1 (Integers)
126.81k
106.07k (x0.84)
Test#2 (FP)
229.86k
115.88k (x0.5)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
61.74k
60.53k (x0.98)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.77k
5.88k (x0.6)
TOTAL
428.19k
288.36k (x0.67)
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
2700X
i5-1235U
Test#1 (Integers)
14.44k
23.03k (x1.6)
Test#2 (FP)
24.92k
24.11k (x0.97)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.8k
13.9k (x2.39)
Test#1 (Memory)
19.07k
12.11k (x0.64)
TOTAL
64.24k
73.15k (x1.14)
Multithread
2700X
i5-1235U
Test#1 (Integers)
122.01k
111.78k (x0.92)
Test#2 (FP)
220.34k
124.18k (x0.56)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
59.89k
59.87k (x1)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.9k
5.76k (x0.58)
TOTAL
412.13k
301.58k (x0.73)
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
2700X
i5-1235U
Test#1 (Integers)
15.34k
36.73k (x2.39)
Test#2 (FP)
25.75k
22.09k (x0.86)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.79k
11.24k (x1.94)
Test#1 (Memory)
17.95k
11.58k (x0.64)
TOTAL
64.83k
81.64k (x1.26)
Multithread
2700X
i5-1235U
Test#1 (Integers)
123.07k
130.18k (x1.06)
Test#2 (FP)
239.3k
110.21k (x0.46)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
60.6k
50.76k (x0.84)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.18k
6.31k (x0.77)
TOTAL
431.14k
297.46k (x0.69)
Performance/W
2700X
i5-1235U
Test#1 (Integers)
1172 points/W
8679 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2279 points/W
7348 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
577 points/W
3384 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
78 points/W
421 points/W
TOTAL
4106 points/W
19831 points/W
Performance/GHz
2700X
i5-1235U
Test#1 (Integers)
3568 points/GHz
8349 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5987 points/GHz
5020 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1347 points/GHz
2555 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
4175 points/GHz
2631 points/GHz
TOTAL
15078 points/GHz
18555 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4