Ryzen 7 2700X vs Core i3-12100T
Description
The 2700X is based on Zen+ architecture while the i3-12100T is based on Alder Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2700X gets a score of 431.1 k points while the i3-12100T gets 330.6 k points.
Summarizing, the 2700X is 1.3 times faster than the i3-12100T. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2700X gets a score of 431.1 k points while the i3-12100T gets 330.6 k points.
Summarizing, the 2700X is 1.3 times faster than the i3-12100T. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
800f82
90675
Core
Pinnacle Ridge
Alder Lake-S
Base frecuency
3.7 GHz
2.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.3 GHz
4.1 GHz
Socket
AM4
LGA 1700
Cores/Threads
8/16
4/8
TDP
105 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x64+8x32 kB
4x32+4x48 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
4x1280 kB
Cache L3
16384 kB
12288 kB
Date
April 2018
January 2022
Mean monothread perf.
64.83k points
93.54k points
Mean multithread perf.
431.14k points
330.62k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
2700X
i3-12100T
Test#1 (Integers)
4.25k
6.88k (x1.62)
Test#2 (FP)
19.72k
17.36k (x0.88)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.84k
12.26k (x2.1)
Test#1 (Memory)
21.36k
13.49k (x0.63)
TOTAL
51.17k
49.98k (x0.98)
Multithread
2700X
i3-12100T
Test#1 (Integers)
35.04k
22.03k (x0.63)
Test#2 (FP)
181.42k
84.16k (x0.46)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
64.86k
46.49k (x0.72)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.21k
8.96k (x1.09)
TOTAL
289.54k
161.65k (x0.56)
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
2700X
i3-12100T
Test#1 (Integers)
15.22k
22.39k (x1.47)
Test#2 (FP)
24.12k
22.29k (x0.92)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.87k
13.37k (x2.28)
Test#1 (Memory)
21k
13.72k (x0.65)
TOTAL
66.21k
71.76k (x1.08)
Multithread
2700X
i3-12100T
Test#1 (Integers)
126.81k
76.69k (x0.6)
Test#2 (FP)
229.86k
104.06k (x0.45)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
61.74k
53.2k (x0.86)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.77k
8.86k (x0.91)
TOTAL
428.19k
242.81k (x0.57)
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
2700X
i3-12100T
Test#1 (Integers)
14.44k
22.25k (x1.54)
Test#2 (FP)
24.92k
23.16k (x0.93)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.8k
13.09k (x2.25)
Test#1 (Memory)
19.07k
13.21k (x0.69)
TOTAL
64.24k
71.7k (x1.12)
Multithread
2700X
i3-12100T
Test#1 (Integers)
122.01k
77.43k (x0.63)
Test#2 (FP)
220.34k
109.08k (x0.5)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
59.89k
52.45k (x0.88)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.9k
8.75k (x0.88)
TOTAL
412.13k
247.71k (x0.6)
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
2700X
i3-12100T
Test#1 (Integers)
15.34k
43.24k (x2.82)
Test#2 (FP)
25.75k
23.76k (x0.92)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.79k
12.67k (x2.19)
Test#1 (Memory)
17.95k
13.88k (x0.77)
TOTAL
64.83k
93.54k (x1.44)
Multithread
2700X
i3-12100T
Test#1 (Integers)
123.07k
150.28k (x1.22)
Test#2 (FP)
239.3k
126.29k (x0.53)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
60.6k
45.32k (x0.75)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.18k
8.73k (x1.07)
TOTAL
431.14k
330.62k (x0.77)
Performance/W
2700X
i3-12100T
Test#1 (Integers)
1172 points/W
4294 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2279 points/W
3608 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
577 points/W
1295 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
78 points/W
249 points/W
TOTAL
4106 points/W
9446 points/W
Performance/GHz
2700X
i3-12100T
Test#1 (Integers)
3568 points/GHz
10546 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5987 points/GHz
5794 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1347 points/GHz
3089 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
4175 points/GHz
3384 points/GHz
TOTAL
15078 points/GHz
22814 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4