| | | | | | |

Ryzen 7 2700X vs Core i7-1195G7


Description
The 2700X is based on Zen+ architecture while the i7-1195G7 is based on Tiger Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2700X gets a score of 431.1 k points while the i7-1195G7 gets 239.6 k points.

Summarizing, the 2700X is 1.8 times faster than the i7-1195G7. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
800f82
806c2
Core
Pinnacle Ridge
Tiger Lake UP3
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.7 GHz
2.9 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.3 GHz
5 GHz
Socket
AM4
BGA 1499
Cores/Threads
8/16
4/8
TDP
105 W
28 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x64+8x32 kB
4x32+4x48 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
4x1280 kB
Cache L3
16384 kB
12288 kB
Date
April 2018
May 2021
Mean monothread perf.
64.83k points
82.77k points
Mean multithread perf.
431.14k points
239.58k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
2700X
i7-1195G7
Test#1 (Integers)
4.25k
4.57k (x1.08)
Test#2 (FP)
19.72k
17.21k (x0.87)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.84k
9.97k (x1.71)
Test#1 (Memory)
21.36k
14.98k (x0.7)
TOTAL
51.17k
46.75k (x0.91)

Multithread

2700X

i7-1195G7
Test#1 (Integers)
35.04k
12.75k (x0.36)
Test#2 (FP)
181.42k
45.98k (x0.25)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
64.86k
27.86k (x0.43)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.21k
20.06k (x2.44)
TOTAL
289.54k
106.66k (x0.37)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
2700X
i7-1195G7
Test#1 (Integers)
15.34k
30.89k (x2.01)
Test#2 (FP)
25.75k
25.57k (x0.99)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.79k
10.64k (x1.84)
Test#1 (Memory)
17.95k
15.66k (x0.87)
TOTAL
64.83k
82.77k (x1.28)

Multithread

2700X

i7-1195G7
Test#1 (Integers)
123.07k
96.34k (x0.78)
Test#2 (FP)
239.3k
95.75k (x0.4)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
60.6k
32.29k (x0.53)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.18k
15.2k (x1.86)
TOTAL
431.14k
239.58k (x0.56)

Performance/W
2700X
i7-1195G7
Test#1 (Integers)
1172 points/W
3441 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2279 points/W
3420 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
577 points/W
1153 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
78 points/W
543 points/W
TOTAL
4106 points/W
8557 points/W

Performance/GHz
2700X
i7-1195G7
Test#1 (Integers)
3568 points/GHz
6179 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5987 points/GHz
5115 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1347 points/GHz
2128 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
4175 points/GHz
3133 points/GHz
TOTAL
15078 points/GHz
16555 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4