Ryzen 7 1800X vs Xeon E5-1620 v2
Description
The 1800X is based on Zen architecture while the E5-1620 v2 is based on Ivy Bridge.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 1800X gets a score of 389.6 k points while the E5-1620 v2 gets 144.6 k points.
Summarizing, the 1800X is 2.7 times faster than the E5-1620 v2 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 1800X gets a score of 389.6 k points while the E5-1620 v2 gets 144.6 k points.
Summarizing, the 1800X is 2.7 times faster than the E5-1620 v2 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
800f11
306e4
Core
Summit Ridge
Ivy Bridge-EP
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
3.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
4 GHz
3.9 GHz
Socket
AM4
LGA 2011
Cores/Threads
8/16
4 /8
TDP
95 W
130 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x64+8x32 kB
4x32+x4x32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
2x8192 kB
10240 kB
Date
March 2017
September 2013
Mean monothread perf.
61.07k points
34.37k points
Mean multithread perf.
410.47k points
144.57k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
1800X
E5-1620 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
15.11k
12.55k (x0.83)
Test#2 (FP)
23.46k
12.14k (x0.52)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.64k
4.83k (x0.86)
Test#1 (Memory)
17.52k
4.85k (x0.28)
TOTAL
61.72k
34.37k (x0.56)
Multithread
1800X
E5-1620 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
119.5k
51.93k (x0.43)
Test#2 (FP)
198.79k
56.7k (x0.29)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
59.75k
23.81k (x0.4)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.58k
12.14k (x1.05)
TOTAL
389.62k
144.57k (x0.37)
Performance/W
1800X
E5-1620 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
1258 points/W
399 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2092 points/W
436 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
629 points/W
183 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
122 points/W
93 points/W
TOTAL
4101 points/W
1112 points/W
Performance/GHz
1800X
E5-1620 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
3776 points/GHz
3217 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5866 points/GHz
3113 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1409 points/GHz
1238 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
4379 points/GHz
1244 points/GHz
TOTAL
15430 points/GHz
8812 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4