Ryzen 7 1800X vs Core i7-8086K
Description
The 1800X is based on Zen architecture while the i7-8086K is based on Coffee Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 1800X gets a score of 410.5 k points while the i7-8086K gets 352.4 k points.
Summarizing, the 1800X is 1.2 times faster than the i7-8086K . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 1800X gets a score of 410.5 k points while the i7-8086K gets 352.4 k points.
Summarizing, the 1800X is 1.2 times faster than the i7-8086K . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
800f11
906ea
Core
Summit Ridge
Coffee Lake-S
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
4 GHz
Boost frecuency
4 GHz
5 GHz
Socket
AM4
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
8/16
6/12
TDP
95 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x64+8x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
2x8192 kB
12288 kB
Date
March 2017
June 2018
Mean monothread perf.
61.07k points
72.95k points
Mean multithread perf.
410.47k points
352.4k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
1800X
i7-8086K
Test#1 (Integers)
15.02k
28.74k (x1.91)
Test#2 (FP)
24.26k
25.31k (x1.04)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.53k
5.78k (x1.05)
Test#1 (Memory)
16.26k
13.12k (x0.81)
TOTAL
61.07k
72.95k (x1.19)
Multithread
1800X
i7-8086K
Test#1 (Integers)
122.92k
160.53k (x1.31)
Test#2 (FP)
220.32k
147.29k (x0.67)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
59.78k
35.65k (x0.6)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.44k
8.92k (x1.2)
TOTAL
410.47k
352.4k (x0.86)
Performance/W
1800X
i7-8086K
Test#1 (Integers)
1294 points/W
1690 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2319 points/W
1550 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
629 points/W
375 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
78 points/W
94 points/W
TOTAL
4321 points/W
3709 points/W
Performance/GHz
1800X
i7-8086K
Test#1 (Integers)
3756 points/GHz
5748 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
6065 points/GHz
5063 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1382 points/GHz
1156 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
4065 points/GHz
2624 points/GHz
TOTAL
15267 points/GHz
14590 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4