Ryzen 7 1800X vs Core i5-10400
Description
The 1800X is based on Zen architecture while the i5-10400 is based on Comet Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 1800X gets a score of 410.5 k points while the i5-10400 gets 367.7 k points.
Summarizing, the 1800X is 1.1 times faster than the i5-10400. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 1800X gets a score of 410.5 k points while the i5-10400 gets 367.7 k points.
Summarizing, the 1800X is 1.1 times faster than the i5-10400. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
800f11
a0653
Core
Summit Ridge
Comet Lake-S
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
2.9 GHz
Boost frecuency
4 GHz
4.3 GHz
Socket
AM4
LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
8/16
6/12
TDP
95 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x64+8x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
2x8192 kB
12288 kB
Date
March 2017
April 2020
Mean monothread perf.
61.07k points
69.31k points
Mean multithread perf.
410.47k points
367.65k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
1800X
i5-10400
Test#1 (Integers)
15.02k
27.46k (x1.83)
Test#2 (FP)
24.26k
24.28k (x1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.53k
5.65k (x1.02)
Test#1 (Memory)
16.26k
11.92k (x0.73)
TOTAL
61.07k
69.31k (x1.13)
Multithread
1800X
i5-10400
Test#1 (Integers)
122.92k
165.5k (x1.35)
Test#2 (FP)
220.32k
156.32k (x0.71)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
59.78k
39.88k (x0.67)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.44k
5.96k (x0.8)
TOTAL
410.47k
367.65k (x0.9)
Performance/W
1800X
i5-10400
Test#1 (Integers)
1294 points/W
2546 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2319 points/W
2405 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
629 points/W
614 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
78 points/W
92 points/W
TOTAL
4321 points/W
5656 points/W
Performance/GHz
1800X
i5-10400
Test#1 (Integers)
3756 points/GHz
6386 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
6065 points/GHz
5647 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1382 points/GHz
1314 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
4065 points/GHz
2772 points/GHz
TOTAL
15267 points/GHz
16118 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4