| | | | | | |

Ryzen 7 1800X vs Core i5-1035G1


Description
The 1800X is based on Zen architecture while the i5-1035G1 is based on Ice Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 1800X gets a score of 410.5 k points while the i5-1035G1 gets 171.6 k points.

Summarizing, the 1800X is 2.4 times faster than the i5-1035G1. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
800f11
706e5
Core
Summit Ridge
Ice Lake-U
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
1 GHz
Boost frecuency
4 GHz
3.6 GHz
Socket
AM4
BGA 1526
Cores/Threads
8/16
4/8
TDP
95 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x64+8x32 kB
4x32+4x48 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
2x8192 kB
6144 kB
Date
March 2017
August 2019
Mean monothread perf.
61.07k points
55.37k points
Mean multithread perf.
410.47k points
171.65k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
1800X
i5-1035G1
Test#1 (Integers)
4.14k
3.88k (x0.94)
Test#2 (FP)
19.07k
14.98k (x0.79)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.77k
9.7k (x1.68)
Test#1 (Memory)
18.28k
8.6k (x0.47)
TOTAL
47.26k
37.15k (x0.79)

Multithread

1800X

i5-1035G1
Test#1 (Integers)
34.48k
14.61k (x0.42)
Test#2 (FP)
169.65k
54.9k (x0.32)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
63.68k
27.58k (x0.43)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.2k
5.04k (x0.62)
TOTAL
276.01k
102.13k (x0.37)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
1800X
i5-1035G1
Test#1 (Integers)
15.11k
13.58k (x0.9)
Test#2 (FP)
23.46k
19.53k (x0.83)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.64k
9.37k (x1.66)
Test#1 (Memory)
17.52k
9.23k (x0.53)
TOTAL
61.72k
51.7k (x0.84)

Multithread

1800X

i5-1035G1
Test#1 (Integers)
119.5k
56.25k (x0.47)
Test#2 (FP)
198.79k
73.73k (x0.37)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
59.75k
29.56k (x0.49)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.58k
5.39k (x0.47)
TOTAL
389.62k
164.94k (x0.42)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
1800X
i5-1035G1
Test#1 (Integers)
15.02k
21.5k (x1.43)
Test#2 (FP)
24.26k
17.71k (x0.73)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.53k
7.92k (x1.43)
Test#1 (Memory)
16.26k
8.24k (x0.51)
TOTAL
61.07k
55.37k (x0.91)

Multithread

1800X

i5-1035G1
Test#1 (Integers)
122.92k
73.03k (x0.59)
Test#2 (FP)
220.32k
68.19k (x0.31)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
59.78k
24.89k (x0.42)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.44k
5.54k (x0.74)
TOTAL
410.47k
171.65k (x0.42)

Performance/W
1800X
i5-1035G1
Test#1 (Integers)
1294 points/W
4869 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2319 points/W
4546 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
629 points/W
1660 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
78 points/W
369 points/W
TOTAL
4321 points/W
11443 points/W

Performance/GHz
1800X
i5-1035G1
Test#1 (Integers)
3756 points/GHz
5972 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
6065 points/GHz
4919 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1382 points/GHz
2201 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
4065 points/GHz
2290 points/GHz
TOTAL
15267 points/GHz
15381 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4