Ryzen 7 1800X vs Core i5-10200H
Description
The 1800X is based on Zen architecture while the i5-10200H is based on Comet Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 1800X gets a score of 410.5 k points while the i5-10200H gets 260.4 k points.
Summarizing, the 1800X is 1.6 times faster than the i5-10200H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 1800X gets a score of 410.5 k points while the i5-10200H gets 260.4 k points.
Summarizing, the 1800X is 1.6 times faster than the i5-10200H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
800f11
a0652
Core
Summit Ridge
Comet Lake-H
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
2.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
4 GHz
4.1 GHz
Socket
AM4
BGA 1440
Cores/Threads
8/16
4/8
TDP
95 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x64+8x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
2x8192 kB
8192 kB
Date
March 2017
September 2020
Mean monothread perf.
61.07k points
67.53k points
Mean multithread perf.
410.47k points
260.38k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
1800X
i5-10200H
Test#1 (Integers)
15.02k
26.37k (x1.76)
Test#2 (FP)
24.26k
23.91k (x0.99)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.53k
5.57k (x1.01)
Test#1 (Memory)
16.26k
11.68k (x0.72)
TOTAL
61.07k
67.53k (x1.11)
Multithread
1800X
i5-10200H
Test#1 (Integers)
122.92k
114.08k (x0.93)
Test#2 (FP)
220.32k
114.71k (x0.52)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
59.78k
27.33k (x0.46)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.44k
4.25k (x0.57)
TOTAL
410.47k
260.38k (x0.63)
Performance/W
1800X
i5-10200H
Test#1 (Integers)
1294 points/W
3259 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2319 points/W
3277 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
629 points/W
781 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
78 points/W
121 points/W
TOTAL
4321 points/W
7439 points/W
Performance/GHz
1800X
i5-10200H
Test#1 (Integers)
3756 points/GHz
6433 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
6065 points/GHz
5831 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1382 points/GHz
1358 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
4065 points/GHz
2848 points/GHz
TOTAL
15267 points/GHz
16470 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4