Ryzen 7 1800X vs 7840HS
Description
The 1800X is based on Zen architecture while the 7840HS is based on Zen 4.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 1800X gets a score of 410.5 k points while the 7840HS gets 622.3 k points.
Summarizing, the 7840HS is 1.5 times faster than the 1800X. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 1800X gets a score of 410.5 k points while the 7840HS gets 622.3 k points.
Summarizing, the 7840HS is 1.5 times faster than the 1800X. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
800f11
a70f41
Core
Summit Ridge
Phoenix
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
3.8 GHz
Boost frecuency
4 GHz
5.1 GHz
Socket
AM4
BGA-FP7r2
Cores/Threads
8/16
8/16
TDP
95 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x64+8x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
8x1024 kB
Cache L3
2x8192 kB
16384 kB
Date
March 2017
January 2023
Mean monothread perf.
61.07k points
91.11k points
Mean multithread perf.
410.47k points
622.34k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
1800X
7840HS
Test#1 (Integers)
15.02k
31.57k (x2.1)
Test#2 (FP)
24.26k
25.2k (x1.04)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.53k
12.42k (x2.25)
Test#1 (Memory)
16.26k
21.93k (x1.35)
TOTAL
61.07k
91.11k (x1.49)
Multithread
1800X
7840HS
Test#1 (Integers)
122.92k
265.26k (x2.16)
Test#2 (FP)
220.32k
226.13k (x1.03)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
59.78k
114.46k (x1.91)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.44k
16.49k (x2.22)
TOTAL
410.47k
622.34k (x1.52)
Performance/W
1800X
7840HS
Test#1 (Integers)
1294 points/W
7579 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2319 points/W
6461 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
629 points/W
3270 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
78 points/W
471 points/W
TOTAL
4321 points/W
17781 points/W
Performance/GHz
1800X
7840HS
Test#1 (Integers)
3756 points/GHz
6190 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
6065 points/GHz
4941 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1382 points/GHz
2436 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
4065 points/GHz
4299 points/GHz
TOTAL
15267 points/GHz
17866 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4