Ryzen 7 1800X vs Ryzen 5 3400G
Description
The 1800X is based on Zen architecture while the 3400G is based on Zen+.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 1800X gets a score of 410.5 k points while the 3400G gets 200.3 k points.
Summarizing, the 1800X is 2 times faster than the 3400G. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 1800X gets a score of 410.5 k points while the 3400G gets 200.3 k points.
Summarizing, the 1800X is 2 times faster than the 3400G. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
800f11
810f81
Core
Summit Ridge
Picasso
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
3.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
4 GHz
4.2 GHz
Socket
AM4
AM4
Cores/Threads
8/16
4/8
TDP
95 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x64+8x32 kB
4x64+4x32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
2x8192 kB
4096 kB
Date
March 2017
July 2019
Mean monothread perf.
61.07k points
50.25k points
Mean multithread perf.
410.47k points
200.34k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
1800X
3400G
Test#1 (Integers)
15.02k
14.58k (x0.97)
Test#2 (FP)
24.26k
23.98k (x0.99)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.53k
5.35k (x0.97)
Test#1 (Memory)
16.26k
6.34k (x0.39)
TOTAL
61.07k
50.25k (x0.82)
Multithread
1800X
3400G
Test#1 (Integers)
122.92k
57.37k (x0.47)
Test#2 (FP)
220.32k
107.03k (x0.49)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
59.78k
28.9k (x0.48)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.44k
7.05k (x0.95)
TOTAL
410.47k
200.34k (x0.49)
Performance/W
1800X
3400G
Test#1 (Integers)
1294 points/W
883 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2319 points/W
1647 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
629 points/W
445 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
78 points/W
108 points/W
TOTAL
4321 points/W
3082 points/W
Performance/GHz
1800X
3400G
Test#1 (Integers)
3756 points/GHz
3471 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
6065 points/GHz
5710 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1382 points/GHz
1275 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
4065 points/GHz
1509 points/GHz
TOTAL
15267 points/GHz
11965 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4