| | | | | | |

Ryzen 7 1800X vs Core i9-13980HX


Description
The 1800X is based on Zen architecture while the i9-13980HX is based on Raptor Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 1800X gets a score of 410.5 k points while the i9-13980HX gets 1317.5 k points.

Summarizing, the i9-13980HX is 3.2 times faster than the 1800X. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
800f11
b0671
Core
Summit Ridge
Raptor Lake-HX
Architecture
Zen
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
2.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
4 GHz
5.6 GHz
Socket
AM4
BGA 1964
Cores/Threads
8/16
24/32
TDP
95 W
55 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x64+8x32 kB
8x32/16x64+8x48/16x32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
8x2048+16x4096 kB
Cache L3
2x8192 kB
36864 kB
Date
March 2017
January 2023
Mean monothread perf.
61.07k points
116.05k points
Mean multithread perf.
410.47k points
1317.53k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
1800X
i9-13980HX
Test#1 (Integers)
15.02k
54.07k (x3.6)
Test#2 (FP)
24.26k
30.22k (x1.25)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.53k
15.67k (x2.84)
Test#1 (Memory)
16.26k
16.09k (x0.99)
TOTAL
61.07k
116.05k (x1.9)

Multithread

1800X

i9-13980HX
Test#1 (Integers)
122.92k
597.18k (x4.86)
Test#2 (FP)
220.32k
466.55k (x2.12)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
59.78k
225.13k (x3.77)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.44k
28.67k (x3.85)
TOTAL
410.47k
1317.53k (x3.21)

Performance/W
1800X
i9-13980HX
Test#1 (Integers)
1294 points/W
10858 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2319 points/W
8483 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
629 points/W
4093 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
78 points/W
521 points/W
TOTAL
4321 points/W
23955 points/W

Performance/GHz
1800X
i9-13980HX
Test#1 (Integers)
3756 points/GHz
9655 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
6065 points/GHz
5396 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1382 points/GHz
2798 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
4065 points/GHz
2874 points/GHz
TOTAL
15267 points/GHz
20723 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4