Ryzen 7 1800X vs Core i5-12400F
Description
The 1800X is based on Zen architecture while the i5-12400F is based on Alder Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 1800X gets a score of 410.5 k points while the i5-12400F gets 512.2 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-12400F is 1.2 times faster than the 1800X. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 1800X gets a score of 410.5 k points while the i5-12400F gets 512.2 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-12400F is 1.2 times faster than the 1800X. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
800f11
90672
Core
Summit Ridge
Alder Lake-S
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
4 GHz
4.4 GHz
Socket
AM4
LGA 1700
Cores/Threads
8/16
6/12
TDP
95 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x64+8x32 kB
6x32+6x48 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
6x1280 kB
Cache L3
2x8192 kB
18432 kB
Date
March 2017
January 2022
Mean monothread perf.
61.07k points
88.01k points
Mean multithread perf.
410.47k points
512.23k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
1800X
i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
15.02k
37.79k (x2.52)
Test#2 (FP)
24.26k
24.07k (x0.99)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.53k
12.44k (x2.25)
Test#1 (Memory)
16.26k
13.71k (x0.84)
TOTAL
61.07k
88.01k (x1.44)
Multithread
1800X
i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
122.92k
212.6k (x1.73)
Test#2 (FP)
220.32k
197.81k (x0.9)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
59.78k
84.35k (x1.41)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.44k
17.48k (x2.35)
TOTAL
410.47k
512.23k (x1.25)
Performance/W
1800X
i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
1294 points/W
3271 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2319 points/W
3043 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
629 points/W
1298 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
78 points/W
269 points/W
TOTAL
4321 points/W
7881 points/W
Performance/GHz
1800X
i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
3756 points/GHz
8588 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
6065 points/GHz
5471 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1382 points/GHz
2827 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
4065 points/GHz
3116 points/GHz
TOTAL
15267 points/GHz
20003 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4