Ryzen 7 1800X vs Core i9-11900KB
Description
The 1800X is based on Zen architecture while the i9-11900KB is based on Tiger Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 1800X gets a score of 410.5 k points while the i9-11900KB gets 537.2 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-11900KB is 1.3 times faster than the 1800X. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 1800X gets a score of 410.5 k points while the i9-11900KB gets 537.2 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-11900KB is 1.3 times faster than the 1800X. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
800f11
806d1
Core
Summit Ridge
Tiger Lake-H
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
3.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
4 GHz
4.9 GHz
Socket
AM4
BGA 1787
Cores/Threads
8/16
8/16
TDP
95 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x64+8x32 kB
8x32+8x48 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
8x1280 kB
Cache L3
2x8192 kB
24576 kB
Date
March 2017
July 2021
Mean monothread perf.
61.07k points
63.79k points
Mean multithread perf.
410.47k points
537.18k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
1800X
i9-11900KB
Test#1 (Integers)
15.02k
24.09k (x1.6)
Test#2 (FP)
24.26k
19.54k (x0.81)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.53k
8.48k (x1.53)
Test#1 (Memory)
16.26k
11.68k (x0.72)
TOTAL
61.07k
63.79k (x1.04)
Multithread
1800X
i9-11900KB
Test#1 (Integers)
122.92k
220.79k (x1.8)
Test#2 (FP)
220.32k
225.98k (x1.03)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
59.78k
79.1k (x1.32)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.44k
11.32k (x1.52)
TOTAL
410.47k
537.18k (x1.31)
Performance/W
1800X
i9-11900KB
Test#1 (Integers)
1294 points/W
3397 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2319 points/W
3477 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
629 points/W
1217 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
78 points/W
174 points/W
TOTAL
4321 points/W
8264 points/W
Performance/GHz
1800X
i9-11900KB
Test#1 (Integers)
3756 points/GHz
4917 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
6065 points/GHz
3988 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1382 points/GHz
1730 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
4065 points/GHz
2384 points/GHz
TOTAL
15267 points/GHz
13018 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4