Ryzen 7 1700X vs Core i7-4820K
Description
The 1700X is based on Zen architecture while the i7-4820K is based on Ivy Bridge.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 1700X gets a score of 313.8 k points while the i7-4820K gets 134.1 k points.
Summarizing, the 1700X is 2.3 times faster than the i7-4820K . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 1700X gets a score of 313.8 k points while the i7-4820K gets 134.1 k points.
Summarizing, the 1700X is 2.3 times faster than the i7-4820K . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
800f11
306e4
Core
Summit Ridge
Ivy Bridge -E
Base frecuency
3.4 GHz
3.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.8 GHz
3.9 GHz
Socket
AM4
LGA 1155
Cores/Threads
8/16
4/8
TDP
95 W
130 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x64+8x32 kB
32+32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
2x8192 kB
8192 kB
Date
March 2017
September 2013
Mean monothread perf.
56.76k points
32.49k points
Mean multithread perf.
372.73k points
134.08k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
1700X
i7-4820K
Test#1 (Integers)
12.5k
11.85k (x0.95)
Test#2 (FP)
22.92k
11.84k (x0.52)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.45k
4.69k (x0.86)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.72k
4.12k (x0.28)
TOTAL
55.59k
32.49k (x0.58)
Multithread
1700X
i7-4820K
Test#1 (Integers)
92.51k
47.65k (x0.52)
Test#2 (FP)
144.76k
54.81k (x0.38)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
54.43k
21.56k (x0.4)
Test#1 (Memory)
22.08k
10.05k (x0.46)
TOTAL
313.78k
134.08k (x0.43)
Performance/W
1700X
i7-4820K
Test#1 (Integers)
974 points/W
367 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1524 points/W
422 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
573 points/W
166 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
232 points/W
77 points/W
TOTAL
3303 points/W
1031 points/W
Performance/GHz
1700X
i7-4820K
Test#1 (Integers)
3289 points/GHz
3039 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
6031 points/GHz
3035 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1435 points/GHz
1201 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3875 points/GHz
1056 points/GHz
TOTAL
14629 points/GHz
8331 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4