| | | | | | |

Ryzen 7 1700X vs Core i7-10870H


Description
The 1700X is based on Zen architecture while the i7-10870H is based on Comet Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 1700X gets a score of 372.7 k points while the i7-10870H gets 487 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-10870H is 1.3 times faster than the 1700X. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
800f11
a0652
Core
Summit Ridge
Comet Lake-H
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.4 GHz
2.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.8 GHz
5 GHz
Socket
AM4
FC-BGA 1440
Cores/Threads
8/16
8/16
TDP
95 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x64+8x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
8x256 kB
Cache L3
2x8192 kB
16384 kB
Date
March 2017
September 2020
Mean monothread perf.
56.76k points
79.2k points
Mean multithread perf.
372.73k points
487.05k points

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
1700X
i7-10870H
Test#1 (Integers)
12.5k
16.14k (x1.29)
Test#2 (FP)
22.92k
24.74k (x1.08)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.45k
5.98k (x1.1)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.72k
12.7k (x0.86)
TOTAL
55.59k
59.55k (x1.07)

Multithread

1700X

i7-10870H
Test#1 (Integers)
92.51k
117.03k (x1.26)
Test#2 (FP)
144.76k
199.88k (x1.38)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
54.43k
50.64k (x0.93)
Test#1 (Memory)
22.08k
8.23k (x0.37)
TOTAL
313.78k
375.77k (x1.2)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
1700X
i7-10870H
Test#1 (Integers)
13.72k
30.38k (x2.21)
Test#2 (FP)
22.48k
27.95k (x1.24)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.12k
6.51k (x1.27)
Test#1 (Memory)
15.44k
14.37k (x0.93)
TOTAL
56.76k
79.2k (x1.4)

Multithread

1700X

i7-10870H
Test#1 (Integers)
110.92k
216.18k (x1.95)
Test#2 (FP)
200.56k
210.82k (x1.05)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
54.24k
51.57k (x0.95)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.01k
8.47k (x1.21)
TOTAL
372.73k
487.05k (x1.31)

Performance/W
1700X
i7-10870H
Test#1 (Integers)
1168 points/W
4804 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2111 points/W
4685 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
571 points/W
1146 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
74 points/W
188 points/W
TOTAL
3923 points/W
10823 points/W

Performance/GHz
1700X
i7-10870H
Test#1 (Integers)
3611 points/GHz
6075 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5916 points/GHz
5589 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1348 points/GHz
1302 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
4063 points/GHz
2873 points/GHz
TOTAL
14938 points/GHz
15840 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4