Ryzen 7 1700X vs Ryzen 9 6900HX
Description
The 1700X is based on Zen architecture while the 6900HX is based on Zen 3+.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 1700X gets a score of 372.7 k points while the 6900HX gets 462.4 k points.
Summarizing, the 6900HX is 1.2 times faster than the 1700X. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 1700X gets a score of 372.7 k points while the 6900HX gets 462.4 k points.
Summarizing, the 6900HX is 1.2 times faster than the 1700X. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
800f11
a40f41
Core
Summit Ridge
Rembrandt
Base frecuency
3.4 GHz
3.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.8 GHz
4.9 GHz
Socket
AM4
BGA-FP7
Cores/Threads
8/16
8/16
TDP
95 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x64+8x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
2x8192 kB
16384 kB
Date
March 2017
February 2022
Mean monothread perf.
56.76k points
87.21k points
Mean multithread perf.
372.73k points
462.36k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
1700X
6900HX
Test#1 (Integers)
13.72k
24.35k (x1.77)
Test#2 (FP)
22.48k
26.85k (x1.19)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.12k
11.82k (x2.31)
Test#1 (Memory)
15.44k
24.18k (x1.57)
TOTAL
56.76k
87.21k (x1.54)
Multithread
1700X
6900HX
Test#1 (Integers)
110.92k
152.84k (x1.38)
Test#2 (FP)
200.56k
208.12k (x1.04)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
54.24k
88.84k (x1.64)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.01k
12.57k (x1.79)
TOTAL
372.73k
462.36k (x1.24)
Performance/W
1700X
6900HX
Test#1 (Integers)
1168 points/W
3396 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2111 points/W
4625 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
571 points/W
1974 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
74 points/W
279 points/W
TOTAL
3923 points/W
10275 points/W
Performance/GHz
1700X
6900HX
Test#1 (Integers)
3611 points/GHz
4969 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5916 points/GHz
5480 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1348 points/GHz
2413 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
4063 points/GHz
4935 points/GHz
TOTAL
14938 points/GHz
17797 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4