| | | | | | |

Ryzen 7 1700X vs Ryzen 5 3580U Microsoft Surface (R) Edition


Description
The 1700X is based on Zen architecture while the 3580U Microsoft Surface (R) Edition is based on Zen+.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 1700X gets a score of 372.7 k points while the 3580U Microsoft Surface (R) Edition gets 174.2 k points.

Summarizing, the 1700X is 2.1 times faster than the 3580U Microsoft Surface (R) Edition. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
800f11
810f81
Core
Summit Ridge
Picasso
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.4 GHz
2.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.8 GHz
3.7 GHz
Socket
AM4
BGA-FP5
Cores/Threads
8/16
4/8
TDP
95 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x64+8x32 kB
4x64+4x32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
2x8192 kB
4096 kB
Date
March 2017
October 2019
Mean monothread perf.
56.76k points
45.3k points
Mean multithread perf.
372.73k points
174.19k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
1700X
3580U Microsoft Surface (R) Edition
Test#1 (Integers)
13.72k
13.77k (x1)
Test#2 (FP)
22.48k
22.62k (x1.01)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.12k
4.91k (x0.96)
Test#1 (Memory)
15.44k
4k (x0.26)
TOTAL
56.76k
45.3k (x0.8)

Multithread

1700X

3580U Microsoft Surface (R) Edition
Test#1 (Integers)
110.92k
50.44k (x0.45)
Test#2 (FP)
200.56k
94k (x0.47)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
54.24k
25.64k (x0.47)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.01k
4.11k (x0.59)
TOTAL
372.73k
174.19k (x0.47)

Performance/W
1700X
3580U Microsoft Surface (R) Edition
Test#1 (Integers)
1168 points/W
3363 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2111 points/W
6267 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
571 points/W
1710 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
74 points/W
274 points/W
TOTAL
3923 points/W
11613 points/W

Performance/GHz
1700X
3580U Microsoft Surface (R) Edition
Test#1 (Integers)
3611 points/GHz
3722 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5916 points/GHz
6113 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1348 points/GHz
1326 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
4063 points/GHz
1082 points/GHz
TOTAL
14938 points/GHz
12243 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4