| | | | | | |

Ryzen 7 1700X vs Ryzen 5 5600G


Description
The 1700X is based on Zen architecture while the 5600G is based on Zen 3.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 1700X gets a score of 372.7 k points while the 5600G gets 345.6 k points.

Summarizing, the 1700X is 1.1 times faster than the 5600G. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
800f11
a50f00
Core
Summit Ridge
Cezanne
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.4 GHz
3.9 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.8 GHz
4.4 GHz
Socket
AM4
AM4
Cores/Threads
8/16
6/12
TDP
95 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x64+8x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
2x8192 kB
16384 kB
Date
March 2017
April 2021
Mean monothread perf.
56.76k points
79.76k points
Mean multithread perf.
372.73k points
345.64k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
1700X
5600G
Test#1 (Integers)
13.72k
22.16k (x1.61)
Test#2 (FP)
22.48k
24.46k (x1.09)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.12k
10.71k (x2.09)
Test#1 (Memory)
15.44k
22.44k (x1.45)
TOTAL
56.76k
79.76k (x1.41)

Multithread

1700X

5600G
Test#1 (Integers)
110.92k
112.5k (x1.01)
Test#2 (FP)
200.56k
153.92k (x0.77)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
54.24k
67.75k (x1.25)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.01k
11.47k (x1.64)
TOTAL
372.73k
345.64k (x0.93)

Performance/W
1700X
5600G
Test#1 (Integers)
1168 points/W
1731 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2111 points/W
2368 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
571 points/W
1042 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
74 points/W
177 points/W
TOTAL
3923 points/W
5318 points/W

Performance/GHz
1700X
5600G
Test#1 (Integers)
3611 points/GHz
5036 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5916 points/GHz
5558 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1348 points/GHz
2434 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
4063 points/GHz
5099 points/GHz
TOTAL
14938 points/GHz
18128 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4