| | | | | | |

Ryzen 7 1700X vs Core i9-13900K


Description
The 1700X is based on Zen architecture while the i9-13900K is based on Raptor Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 1700X gets a score of 372.7 k points while the i9-13900K gets 1763.1 k points.

Summarizing, the i9-13900K is 4.7 times faster than the 1700X. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
800f11
b0671
Core
Summit Ridge
Raptor Lake-S
Architecture
Zen
Base frecuency
3.4 GHz
2.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.8 GHz
5.8 GHz
Socket
AM4
LGA 1700
Cores/Threads
8/16
24/32
TDP
95 W
125 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x64+8x32 kB
8x32/16x64+8x48/16x32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
8x2048+4x4096 kB
Cache L3
2x8192 kB
36864 kB
Date
March 2017
October 2022
Mean monothread perf.
56.76k points
129.15k points
Mean multithread perf.
372.73k points
1763.08k points

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
1700X
i9-13900K
Test#1 (Integers)
12.5k
31.8k (x2.54)
Test#2 (FP)
22.92k
32.83k (x1.43)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.45k
18.37k (x3.37)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.72k
21.13k (x1.44)
TOTAL
55.59k
104.13k (x1.87)

Multithread

1700X

i9-13900K
Test#1 (Integers)
92.51k
532.97k (x5.76)
Test#2 (FP)
144.76k
596.78k (x4.12)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
54.43k
342.96k (x6.3)
Test#1 (Memory)
22.08k
28.6k (x1.3)
TOTAL
313.78k
1501.31k (x4.78)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
1700X
i9-13900K
Test#1 (Integers)
13.72k
58.6k (x4.27)
Test#2 (FP)
22.48k
33.29k (x1.48)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.12k
17.77k (x3.47)
Test#1 (Memory)
15.44k
19.49k (x1.26)
TOTAL
56.76k
129.15k (x2.28)

Multithread

1700X

i9-13900K
Test#1 (Integers)
110.92k
804.04k (x7.25)
Test#2 (FP)
200.56k
613.45k (x3.06)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
54.24k
311.08k (x5.74)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.01k
34.5k (x4.92)
TOTAL
372.73k
1763.08k (x4.73)

Performance/W
1700X
i9-13900K
Test#1 (Integers)
1168 points/W
6432 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2111 points/W
4908 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
571 points/W
2489 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
74 points/W
276 points/W
TOTAL
3923 points/W
14105 points/W

Performance/GHz
1700X
i9-13900K
Test#1 (Integers)
3611 points/GHz
10104 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5916 points/GHz
5739 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1348 points/GHz
3064 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
4063 points/GHz
3360 points/GHz
TOTAL
14938 points/GHz
22268 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4