Ryzen 7 1700X vs Core i9-13900HX
Description
The 1700X is based on Zen architecture while the i9-13900HX is based on Raptor Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 1700X gets a score of 372.7 k points while the i9-13900HX gets 1160.7 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-13900HX is 3.1 times faster than the 1700X. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 1700X gets a score of 372.7 k points while the i9-13900HX gets 1160.7 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-13900HX is 3.1 times faster than the 1700X. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
800f11
b0671
Core
Summit Ridge
Raptor Lake-HX
Base frecuency
3.4 GHz
2.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.8 GHz
5.4 GHz
Socket
AM4
BGA 1964
Cores/Threads
8/16
24/32
TDP
95 W
55 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x64+8x32 kB
8x32/16x64+8x48/16x32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
8x2048/4x4096 kB
Cache L3
2x8192 kB
36864 kB
Date
March 2017
January 2023
Mean monothread perf.
56.76k points
112.85k points
Mean multithread perf.
372.73k points
1160.72k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
1700X
i9-13900HX
Test#1 (Integers)
13.72k
53.69k (x3.91)
Test#2 (FP)
22.48k
28.76k (x1.28)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.12k
14.93k (x2.91)
Test#1 (Memory)
15.44k
15.47k (x1)
TOTAL
56.76k
112.85k (x1.99)
Multithread
1700X
i9-13900HX
Test#1 (Integers)
110.92k
526.44k (x4.75)
Test#2 (FP)
200.56k
420.48k (x2.1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
54.24k
196.13k (x3.62)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.01k
17.68k (x2.52)
TOTAL
372.73k
1160.72k (x3.11)
Performance/W
1700X
i9-13900HX
Test#1 (Integers)
1168 points/W
9572 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2111 points/W
7645 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
571 points/W
3566 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
74 points/W
321 points/W
TOTAL
3923 points/W
21104 points/W
Performance/GHz
1700X
i9-13900HX
Test#1 (Integers)
3611 points/GHz
9942 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5916 points/GHz
5326 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1348 points/GHz
2765 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
4063 points/GHz
2865 points/GHz
TOTAL
14938 points/GHz
20898 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4