| | | | | | |

Ryzen 7 1700X vs Core i5-12400F


Description
The 1700X is based on Zen architecture while the i5-12400F is based on Alder Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 1700X gets a score of 372.7 k points while the i5-12400F gets 399.4 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-12400F is 1.1 times faster than the 1700X. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
800f11
90675
Core
Summit Ridge
Alder Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.4 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.8 GHz
4.4 GHz
Socket
AM4
LGA 1700
Cores/Threads
8/16
6/12
TDP
95 W
117 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x64+8x32 kB
6x32/0x64+6x48/0x32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
6x1280+0x2048 kB
Cache L3
2x8192 kB
18432 kB
Date
March 2017
January 2022
Mean monothread perf.
56.76k points
76.46k points
Mean multithread perf.
372.73k points
399.39k points

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
1700X
i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
12.5k
24.24k (x1.94)
Test#2 (FP)
22.92k
24.74k (x1.08)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.45k
13.95k (x2.56)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.72k
14.47k (x0.98)
TOTAL
55.59k
77.41k (x1.39)

Multithread

1700X

i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
92.51k
126.87k (x1.37)
Test#2 (FP)
144.76k
186.48k (x1.29)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
54.43k
92.37k (x1.7)
Test#1 (Memory)
22.08k
15.45k (x0.7)
TOTAL
313.78k
421.18k (x1.34)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
1700X
i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
13.72k
33.85k (x2.47)
Test#2 (FP)
22.48k
20.33k (x0.9)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.12k
10.51k (x2.05)
Test#1 (Memory)
15.44k
11.77k (x0.76)
TOTAL
56.76k
76.46k (x1.35)

Multithread

1700X

i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
110.92k
174.21k (x1.57)
Test#2 (FP)
200.56k
141.31k (x0.7)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
54.24k
64.86k (x1.2)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.01k
19.01k (x2.71)
TOTAL
372.73k
399.39k (x1.07)

Performance/W
1700X
i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
1168 points/W
1489 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2111 points/W
1208 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
571 points/W
554 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
74 points/W
162 points/W
TOTAL
3923 points/W
3414 points/W

Performance/GHz
1700X
i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
3611 points/GHz
7693 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5916 points/GHz
4621 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1348 points/GHz
2389 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
4063 points/GHz
2675 points/GHz
TOTAL
14938 points/GHz
17378 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4