Ryzen 7 1700X vs Core i5-12400F
Description
The 1700X is based on Zen architecture while the i5-12400F is based on Alder Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 1700X gets a score of 372.7 k points while the i5-12400F gets 512.2 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-12400F is 1.4 times faster than the 1700X. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 1700X gets a score of 372.7 k points while the i5-12400F gets 512.2 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-12400F is 1.4 times faster than the 1700X. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
800f11
90672
Core
Summit Ridge
Alder Lake-S
Base frecuency
3.4 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.8 GHz
4.4 GHz
Socket
AM4
LGA 1700
Cores/Threads
8/16
6/12
TDP
95 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x64+8x32 kB
6x32+6x48 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
6x1280 kB
Cache L3
2x8192 kB
18432 kB
Date
March 2017
January 2022
Mean monothread perf.
56.76k points
88.01k points
Mean multithread perf.
372.73k points
512.23k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
1700X
i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
13.72k
37.79k (x2.75)
Test#2 (FP)
22.48k
24.07k (x1.07)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.12k
12.44k (x2.43)
Test#1 (Memory)
15.44k
13.71k (x0.89)
TOTAL
56.76k
88.01k (x1.55)
Multithread
1700X
i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
110.92k
212.6k (x1.92)
Test#2 (FP)
200.56k
197.81k (x0.99)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
54.24k
84.35k (x1.56)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.01k
17.48k (x2.5)
TOTAL
372.73k
512.23k (x1.37)
Performance/W
1700X
i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
1168 points/W
3271 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2111 points/W
3043 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
571 points/W
1298 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
74 points/W
269 points/W
TOTAL
3923 points/W
7881 points/W
Performance/GHz
1700X
i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
3611 points/GHz
8588 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5916 points/GHz
5471 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1348 points/GHz
2827 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
4063 points/GHz
3116 points/GHz
TOTAL
14938 points/GHz
20003 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4