Ryzen 7 1700X vs Core i7-1195G7
Description
The 1700X is based on Zen architecture while the i7-1195G7 is based on Tiger Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 1700X gets a score of 372.7 k points while the i7-1195G7 gets 239.6 k points.
Summarizing, the 1700X is 1.6 times faster than the i7-1195G7. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 1700X gets a score of 372.7 k points while the i7-1195G7 gets 239.6 k points.
Summarizing, the 1700X is 1.6 times faster than the i7-1195G7. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
800f11
806c2
Core
Summit Ridge
Tiger Lake UP3
Base frecuency
3.4 GHz
2.9 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.8 GHz
5 GHz
Socket
AM4
BGA 1499
Cores/Threads
8/16
4/8
TDP
95 W
28 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x64+8x32 kB
4x32+4x48 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
4x1280 kB
Cache L3
2x8192 kB
12288 kB
Date
March 2017
May 2021
Mean monothread perf.
56.76k points
82.77k points
Mean multithread perf.
372.73k points
239.58k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
1700X
i7-1195G7
Test#1 (Integers)
13.72k
30.89k (x2.25)
Test#2 (FP)
22.48k
25.57k (x1.14)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.12k
10.64k (x2.08)
Test#1 (Memory)
15.44k
15.66k (x1.01)
TOTAL
56.76k
82.77k (x1.46)
Multithread
1700X
i7-1195G7
Test#1 (Integers)
110.92k
96.34k (x0.87)
Test#2 (FP)
200.56k
95.75k (x0.48)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
54.24k
32.29k (x0.6)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.01k
15.2k (x2.17)
TOTAL
372.73k
239.58k (x0.64)
Performance/W
1700X
i7-1195G7
Test#1 (Integers)
1168 points/W
3441 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2111 points/W
3420 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
571 points/W
1153 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
74 points/W
543 points/W
TOTAL
3923 points/W
8557 points/W
Performance/GHz
1700X
i7-1195G7
Test#1 (Integers)
3611 points/GHz
6179 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5916 points/GHz
5115 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1348 points/GHz
2128 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
4063 points/GHz
3133 points/GHz
TOTAL
14938 points/GHz
16555 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4