Ryzen 7 1700 vs 3800X
Description
The 1700 is based on Zen architecture while the 3800X is based on Zen 2.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 1700 gets a score of 333.3 k points while the 3800X gets 497.7 k points.
Summarizing, the 3800X is 1.5 times faster than the 1700. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 1700 gets a score of 333.3 k points while the 3800X gets 497.7 k points.
Summarizing, the 3800X is 1.5 times faster than the 1700. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
800f11
870f10
Core
Summit Ridge
Matisse
Base frecuency
3 GHz
3.9 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.7 GHz
4.5 GHz
Socket
AM4
AM4
Cores/Threads
8/16
8/16
TDP
65 W
105 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x64+8x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
2x8192 kB
32768 kB
Date
March 2017
July 2019
Mean monothread perf.
52.69k points
75.81k points
Mean multithread perf.
333.31k points
497.74k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
1700
3800X
Test#1 (Integers)
13.95k
16.76k (x1.2)
Test#2 (FP)
22.02k
25.16k (x1.14)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.17k
8.76k (x1.7)
Test#1 (Memory)
16.61k
24.3k (x1.46)
TOTAL
57.75k
74.98k (x1.3)
Multithread
1700
3800X
Test#1 (Integers)
120.59k
131.36k (x1.09)
Test#2 (FP)
197.34k
198.51k (x1.01)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
56.83k
97.27k (x1.71)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.41k
13.4k (x2.09)
TOTAL
381.16k
440.54k (x1.16)
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
1700
3800X
Test#1 (Integers)
12.65k
17.1k (x1.35)
Test#2 (FP)
20.95k
26.59k (x1.27)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.63k
8.91k (x1.93)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.47k
23.21k (x1.6)
TOTAL
52.69k
75.81k (x1.44)
Multithread
1700
3800X
Test#1 (Integers)
101.78k
172.04k (x1.69)
Test#2 (FP)
177.57k
214.03k (x1.21)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
47.18k
97.1k (x2.06)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.78k
14.57k (x2.15)
TOTAL
333.31k
497.74k (x1.49)
Performance/W
1700
3800X
Test#1 (Integers)
1566 points/W
1638 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2732 points/W
2038 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
726 points/W
925 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
104 points/W
139 points/W
TOTAL
5128 points/W
4740 points/W
Performance/GHz
1700
3800X
Test#1 (Integers)
3419 points/GHz
3799 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5661 points/GHz
5909 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1251 points/GHz
1981 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3911 points/GHz
5158 points/GHz
TOTAL
14241 points/GHz
16847 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4