| | | | | | |

Ryzen 5 4680U Microsoft Surface Edition vs Ryzen 7 5800U


Description
The 4680U Microsoft Surface Edition is based on Zen 2 architecture while the 5800U is based on Zen 3.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 4680U Microsoft Surface Edition gets a score of 327.7 k points while the 5800U gets 314.5 k points.

Summarizing, the 4680U Microsoft Surface Edition is 1 times faster than the 5800U . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
860f01
a50f00
Core
Renoir
Cezanne
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.2 GHz
1.9 GHz
Boost frecuency
4 GHz
4.4 GHz
Socket
BGA-FP6
BGA-FP6
Cores/Threads
6/12
8/16
TDP
15 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
6x512 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
2x4096 kB
16384 kB
Date
April 2021
January 2021
Mean monothread perf.
55.74k points
71.16k points
Mean multithread perf.
327.72k points
314.55k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
4680U Microsoft Surface Edition
5800U
Test#1 (Integers)
15.5k
18.34k (x1.18)
Test#2 (FP)
22.96k
22.78k (x0.99)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.78k
9.45k (x1.08)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.5k
20.59k (x2.42)
TOTAL
55.74k
71.16k (x1.28)

Multithread

4680U Microsoft Surface Edition

5800U
Test#1 (Integers)
110.78k
102.74k (x0.93)
Test#2 (FP)
149.38k
143.27k (x0.96)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
60.88k
58.13k (x0.95)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.68k
10.41k (x1.56)
TOTAL
327.72k
314.55k (x0.96)

Performance/W
4680U Microsoft Surface Edition
5800U
Test#1 (Integers)
7386 points/W
6849 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
9959 points/W
9551 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4059 points/W
3875 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
445 points/W
694 points/W
TOTAL
21848 points/W
20970 points/W

Performance/GHz
4680U Microsoft Surface Edition
5800U
Test#1 (Integers)
3876 points/GHz
4168 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5739 points/GHz
5178 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2195 points/GHz
2147 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2125 points/GHz
4679 points/GHz
TOTAL
13935 points/GHz
16172 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4