| | | | | | |

Ryzen 5 4680U Microsoft Surface Edition vs Ryzen 7 5800H


Description
The 4680U Microsoft Surface Edition is based on Zen 2 architecture while the 5800H is based on Zen 3.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 4680U Microsoft Surface Edition gets a score of 327.7 k points while the 5800H gets 426.9 k points.

Summarizing, the 5800H is 1.3 times faster than the 4680U Microsoft Surface Edition. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
860f01
a50f00
Core
Renoir
Cezanne
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.2 GHz
3.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
4 GHz
4.4 GHz
Socket
BGA-FP6
BGA 1140
Cores/Threads
6/12
8/16
TDP
15 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
6x512 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
2x4096 kB
16384 kB
Date
April 2021
February 2021
Mean monothread perf.
55.74k points
74.56k points
Mean multithread perf.
327.72k points
426.9k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
4680U Microsoft Surface Edition
5800H
Test#1 (Integers)
15.5k
20.37k (x1.31)
Test#2 (FP)
22.96k
22.52k (x0.98)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.78k
10.18k (x1.16)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.5k
21.49k (x2.53)
TOTAL
55.74k
74.56k (x1.34)

Multithread

4680U Microsoft Surface Edition

5800H
Test#1 (Integers)
110.78k
144.01k (x1.3)
Test#2 (FP)
149.38k
191.86k (x1.28)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
60.88k
84.53k (x1.39)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.68k
6.5k (x0.97)
TOTAL
327.72k
426.9k (x1.3)

Performance/W
4680U Microsoft Surface Edition
5800H
Test#1 (Integers)
7386 points/W
3200 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
9959 points/W
4264 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4059 points/W
1878 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
445 points/W
144 points/W
TOTAL
21848 points/W
9487 points/W

Performance/GHz
4680U Microsoft Surface Edition
5800H
Test#1 (Integers)
3876 points/GHz
4630 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5739 points/GHz
5117 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2195 points/GHz
2314 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2125 points/GHz
4883 points/GHz
TOTAL
13935 points/GHz
16944 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4