Ryzen 5 4680U Microsoft Surface Edition vs Core i3-13100F
Description
The 4680U Microsoft Surface Edition is based on Zen 2 architecture while the i3-13100F is based on Raptor Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 4680U Microsoft Surface Edition gets a score of 327.7 k points while the i3-13100F gets 390.2 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-13100F is 1.2 times faster than the 4680U Microsoft Surface Edition. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 4680U Microsoft Surface Edition gets a score of 327.7 k points while the i3-13100F gets 390.2 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-13100F is 1.2 times faster than the 4680U Microsoft Surface Edition. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
860f01
b06f5
Core
Renoir
Raptor Lake-S
Base frecuency
2.2 GHz
3.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
4 GHz
4.5 GHz
Socket
BGA-FP6
LGA 1700
Cores/Threads
6/12
4/8
TDP
15 W
58 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
4x32+4x48 kB
Cache L2
6x512 kB
4x1280 kB
Cache L3
2x4096 kB
12288 kB
Date
April 2021
January 2023
Mean monothread perf.
55.74k points
100.94k points
Mean multithread perf.
327.72k points
390.23k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
4680U Microsoft Surface Edition
i3-13100F
Test#1 (Integers)
15.5k
47.14k (x3.04)
Test#2 (FP)
22.96k
25.77k (x1.12)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.78k
13.25k (x1.51)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.5k
14.77k (x1.74)
TOTAL
55.74k
100.94k (x1.81)
Multithread
4680U Microsoft Surface Edition
i3-13100F
Test#1 (Integers)
110.78k
168.51k (x1.52)
Test#2 (FP)
149.38k
142.8k (x0.96)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
60.88k
63.57k (x1.04)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.68k
15.34k (x2.3)
TOTAL
327.72k
390.23k (x1.19)
Performance/W
4680U Microsoft Surface Edition
i3-13100F
Test#1 (Integers)
7386 points/W
2905 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
9959 points/W
2462 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4059 points/W
1096 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
445 points/W
264 points/W
TOTAL
21848 points/W
6728 points/W
Performance/GHz
4680U Microsoft Surface Edition
i3-13100F
Test#1 (Integers)
3876 points/GHz
10476 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5739 points/GHz
5728 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2195 points/GHz
2945 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2125 points/GHz
3283 points/GHz
TOTAL
13935 points/GHz
22432 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4