| | | | | | |

Ryzen 5 4680U Microsoft Surface Edition vs Core i7-1260P


Description
The 4680U Microsoft Surface Edition is based on Zen 2 architecture while the i7-1260P is based on Alder Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 4680U Microsoft Surface Edition gets a score of 327.7 k points while the i7-1260P gets 391.1 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-1260P is 1.2 times faster than the 4680U Microsoft Surface Edition. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
860f01
906a3
Core
Renoir
Alder Lake-P
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.2 GHz
2.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
4 GHz
4.7 GHz
Socket
BGA-FP6
BGA 1744
Cores/Threads
6/12
12/16
TDP
15 W
28 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
4x32/8X64+4x48/8X32 kB
Cache L2
6x512 kB
4x1280+8x2048 kB
Cache L3
2x4096 kB
18432 kB
Date
April 2021
February 2022
Mean monothread perf.
55.74k points
94.9k points
Mean multithread perf.
327.72k points
391.07k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
4680U Microsoft Surface Edition
i7-1260P
Test#1 (Integers)
15.5k
41.94k (x2.71)
Test#2 (FP)
22.96k
26.81k (x1.17)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.78k
12.63k (x1.44)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.5k
13.51k (x1.59)
TOTAL
55.74k
94.9k (x1.7)

Multithread

4680U Microsoft Surface Edition

i7-1260P
Test#1 (Integers)
110.78k
168.12k (x1.52)
Test#2 (FP)
149.38k
148.09k (x0.99)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
60.88k
60.28k (x0.99)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.68k
14.58k (x2.18)
TOTAL
327.72k
391.07k (x1.19)

Performance/W
4680U Microsoft Surface Edition
i7-1260P
Test#1 (Integers)
7386 points/W
6004 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
9959 points/W
5289 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4059 points/W
2153 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
445 points/W
521 points/W
TOTAL
21848 points/W
13967 points/W

Performance/GHz
4680U Microsoft Surface Edition
i7-1260P
Test#1 (Integers)
3876 points/GHz
8924 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5739 points/GHz
5705 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2195 points/GHz
2687 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2125 points/GHz
2875 points/GHz
TOTAL
13935 points/GHz
20191 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4