| | | | | | |

Ryzen 5 4680U Microsoft Surface Edition vs Core i3-1220P


Description
The 4680U Microsoft Surface Edition is based on Zen 2 architecture while the i3-1220P is based on Alder Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 4680U Microsoft Surface Edition gets a score of 327.7 k points while the i3-1220P gets 404.7 k points.

Summarizing, the i3-1220P is 1.2 times faster than the 4680U Microsoft Surface Edition. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
860f01
906a4
Core
Renoir
Alder Lake-P
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.2 GHz
1.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
4 GHz
4.4 GHz
Socket
BGA-FP6
BGA 1744
Cores/Threads
6/12
10/12
TDP
15 W
28 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
2x32/8x64+2x48/8x32 kB
Cache L2
6x512 kB
2x1280/2x2048 kB
Cache L3
2x4096 kB
12288 kB
Date
April 2021
March 2022
Mean monothread perf.
55.74k points
81.92k points
Mean multithread perf.
327.72k points
404.74k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
4680U Microsoft Surface Edition
i3-1220P
Test#1 (Integers)
15.5k
37.43k (x2.41)
Test#2 (FP)
22.96k
19.6k (x0.85)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.78k
12.99k (x1.48)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.5k
11.9k (x1.4)
TOTAL
55.74k
81.92k (x1.47)

Multithread

4680U Microsoft Surface Edition

i3-1220P
Test#1 (Integers)
110.78k
178.85k (x1.61)
Test#2 (FP)
149.38k
153.82k (x1.03)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
60.88k
69.38k (x1.14)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.68k
2.69k (x0.4)
TOTAL
327.72k
404.74k (x1.24)

Performance/W
4680U Microsoft Surface Edition
i3-1220P
Test#1 (Integers)
7386 points/W
6387 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
9959 points/W
5494 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4059 points/W
2478 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
445 points/W
96 points/W
TOTAL
21848 points/W
14455 points/W

Performance/GHz
4680U Microsoft Surface Edition
i3-1220P
Test#1 (Integers)
3876 points/GHz
8506 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5739 points/GHz
4455 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2195 points/GHz
2953 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2125 points/GHz
2704 points/GHz
TOTAL
13935 points/GHz
18618 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4