Ryzen 5 3580U Microsoft Surface (R) Edition vs Xeon E5-2620 v4
Description
The 3580U Microsoft Surface (R) Edition is based on Zen+ architecture while the E5-2620 v4 is based on Broadwell.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3580U Microsoft Surface (R) Edition gets a score of 174.2 k points while the E5-2620 v4 gets 237.8 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2620 v4 is 1.4 times faster than the 3580U Microsoft Surface (R) Edition. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3580U Microsoft Surface (R) Edition gets a score of 174.2 k points while the E5-2620 v4 gets 237.8 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2620 v4 is 1.4 times faster than the 3580U Microsoft Surface (R) Edition. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
810f81
406f1
Core
Picasso
Broadwell-EP
Base frecuency
2.1 GHz
2.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.7 GHz
3 GHz
Socket
BGA-FP5
Socket 2011-3
Cores/Threads
4/8
8/16
TDP
15 W
85 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x64+4x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
8x256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
20480 kB
Date
October 2019
March 2016
Mean monothread perf.
45.3k points
29.39k points
Mean multithread perf.
174.19k points
237.83k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3580U Microsoft Surface (R) Edition
E5-2620 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
13.77k
12.16k (x0.88)
Test#2 (FP)
22.62k
11.82k (x0.52)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.91k
3.02k (x0.61)
Test#1 (Memory)
4k
2.4k (x0.6)
TOTAL
45.3k
29.39k (x0.65)
Multithread
3580U Microsoft Surface (R) Edition
E5-2620 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
50.44k
103.77k (x2.06)
Test#2 (FP)
94k
102.28k (x1.09)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
25.64k
26.13k (x1.02)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.11k
5.65k (x1.38)
TOTAL
174.19k
237.83k (x1.37)
Performance/W
3580U Microsoft Surface (R) Edition
E5-2620 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
3363 points/W
1221 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
6267 points/W
1203 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1710 points/W
307 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
274 points/W
66 points/W
TOTAL
11613 points/W
2798 points/W
Performance/GHz
3580U Microsoft Surface (R) Edition
E5-2620 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
3722 points/GHz
4054 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
6113 points/GHz
3939 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1326 points/GHz
1005 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1082 points/GHz
799 points/GHz
TOTAL
12243 points/GHz
9798 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4