| | | | | | |

Ryzen 5 3580U Microsoft Surface (R) Edition vs Core i7-8550U


Description
The 3580U Microsoft Surface (R) Edition is based on Zen+ architecture while the i7-8550U is based on Kaby Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3580U Microsoft Surface (R) Edition gets a score of 174.2 k points while the i7-8550U gets 166.1 k points.

Summarizing, the 3580U Microsoft Surface (R) Edition is 1 times faster than the i7-8550U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
810f81
806ea
Core
Picasso
Kaby Lake-R
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.1 GHz
1.8 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.7 GHz
4 GHz
Socket
BGA-FP5
BGA1356
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/8
TDP
15 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x64+4x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
8192 kB
Date
October 2019
August 2017
Mean monothread perf.
45.3k points
64.2k points
Mean multithread perf.
174.19k points
166.12k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3580U Microsoft Surface (R) Edition
i7-8550U
Test#1 (Integers)
13.77k
25.37k (x1.84)
Test#2 (FP)
22.62k
22.6k (x1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.91k
5.13k (x1.04)
Test#1 (Memory)
4k
11.1k (x2.77)
TOTAL
45.3k
64.2k (x1.42)

Multithread

3580U Microsoft Surface (R) Edition

i7-8550U
Test#1 (Integers)
50.44k
72.82k (x1.44)
Test#2 (FP)
94k
71.71k (x0.76)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
25.64k
17.35k (x0.68)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.11k
4.24k (x1.03)
TOTAL
174.19k
166.12k (x0.95)

Performance/W
3580U Microsoft Surface (R) Edition
i7-8550U
Test#1 (Integers)
3363 points/W
4855 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
6267 points/W
4781 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1710 points/W
1157 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
274 points/W
282 points/W
TOTAL
11613 points/W
11075 points/W

Performance/GHz
3580U Microsoft Surface (R) Edition
i7-8550U
Test#1 (Integers)
3722 points/GHz
6343 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
6113 points/GHz
5650 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1326 points/GHz
1282 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1082 points/GHz
2774 points/GHz
TOTAL
12243 points/GHz
16049 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4