| | | | | | |

Ryzen 5 3580U Microsoft Surface (R) Edition vs Core i7-4720HQ


Description
The 3580U Microsoft Surface (R) Edition is based on Zen+ architecture while the i7-4720HQ is based on Haswell.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3580U Microsoft Surface (R) Edition gets a score of 174.2 k points while the i7-4720HQ gets 132.3 k points.

Summarizing, the 3580U Microsoft Surface (R) Edition is 1.3 times faster than the i7-4720HQ. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
810f81
306c3
Core
Picasso
Haswell
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.1 GHz
2.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.7 GHz
3.6 GHz
Socket
BGA-FP5
BGA1364
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/8
TDP
15 W
47 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x64+4x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
6144 kB
Date
October 2019
January 2015
Mean monothread perf.
45.3k points
40.12k points
Mean multithread perf.
174.19k points
132.35k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3580U Microsoft Surface (R) Edition
i7-4720HQ
Test#1 (Integers)
13.77k
20.68k (x1.5)
Test#2 (FP)
22.62k
10.28k (x0.45)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.91k
4.87k (x0.99)
Test#1 (Memory)
4k
4.29k (x1.07)
TOTAL
45.3k
40.12k (x0.89)

Multithread

3580U Microsoft Surface (R) Edition

i7-4720HQ
Test#1 (Integers)
50.44k
66.84k (x1.33)
Test#2 (FP)
94k
42.85k (x0.46)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
25.64k
16.77k (x0.65)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.11k
5.88k (x1.43)
TOTAL
174.19k
132.35k (x0.76)

Performance/W
3580U Microsoft Surface (R) Edition
i7-4720HQ
Test#1 (Integers)
3363 points/W
1422 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
6267 points/W
912 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1710 points/W
357 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
274 points/W
125 points/W
TOTAL
11613 points/W
2816 points/W

Performance/GHz
3580U Microsoft Surface (R) Edition
i7-4720HQ
Test#1 (Integers)
3722 points/GHz
5745 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
6113 points/GHz
2856 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1326 points/GHz
1352 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1082 points/GHz
1191 points/GHz
TOTAL
12243 points/GHz
11143 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4