| | | | | | |

Ryzen 5 3580U Microsoft Surface (R) Edition vs Core i7-4702MQ


Description
The 3580U Microsoft Surface (R) Edition is based on Zen+ architecture while the i7-4702MQ is based on Haswell.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3580U Microsoft Surface (R) Edition gets a score of 174.2 k points while the i7-4702MQ gets 145.1 k points.

Summarizing, the 3580U Microsoft Surface (R) Edition is 1.2 times faster than the i7-4702MQ . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
810f81
306c3
Core
Picasso
Haswell
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.1 GHz
2.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.7 GHz
3.2 GHz
Socket
BGA-FP5
Socket G3
Cores/Threads
4/8
4 /8
TDP
15 W
37 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x64+4x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
8192 kB
Date
October 2019
May 2013
Mean monothread perf.
45.3k points
36.8k points
Mean multithread perf.
174.19k points
145.15k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3580U Microsoft Surface (R) Edition
i7-4702MQ
Test#1 (Integers)
13.77k
18.98k (x1.38)
Test#2 (FP)
22.62k
9.5k (x0.42)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.91k
4.32k (x0.88)
Test#1 (Memory)
4k
3.99k (x1)
TOTAL
45.3k
36.8k (x0.81)

Multithread

3580U Microsoft Surface (R) Edition

i7-4702MQ
Test#1 (Integers)
50.44k
74.75k (x1.48)
Test#2 (FP)
94k
47.72k (x0.51)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
25.64k
19.65k (x0.77)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.11k
3.02k (x0.74)
TOTAL
174.19k
145.15k (x0.83)

Performance/W
3580U Microsoft Surface (R) Edition
i7-4702MQ
Test#1 (Integers)
3363 points/W
2020 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
6267 points/W
1290 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1710 points/W
531 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
274 points/W
82 points/W
TOTAL
11613 points/W
3923 points/W

Performance/GHz
3580U Microsoft Surface (R) Edition
i7-4702MQ
Test#1 (Integers)
3722 points/GHz
5932 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
6113 points/GHz
2968 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1326 points/GHz
1351 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1082 points/GHz
1248 points/GHz
TOTAL
12243 points/GHz
11499 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4