| | | | | | |

Ryzen 5 3580U Microsoft Surface (R) Edition vs Core i5-7500


Description
The 3580U Microsoft Surface (R) Edition is based on Zen+ architecture while the i5-7500 is based on Kaby Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3580U Microsoft Surface (R) Edition gets a score of 174.2 k points while the i5-7500 gets 191.7 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-7500 is 1.1 times faster than the 3580U Microsoft Surface (R) Edition. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
810f81
906e9
Core
Picasso
Kaby Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.1 GHz
3.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.7 GHz
3.8 GHz
Socket
BGA-FP5
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/4
TDP
15 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x64+4x32 kB
32+32 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
6144 kB
Date
October 2019
September 2016
Mean monothread perf.
45.3k points
61.51k points
Mean multithread perf.
174.19k points
191.71k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3580U Microsoft Surface (R) Edition
i5-7500
Test#1 (Integers)
13.77k
25.59k (x1.86)
Test#2 (FP)
22.62k
22.57k (x1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.91k
5.27k (x1.07)
Test#1 (Memory)
4k
8.08k (x2.02)
TOTAL
45.3k
61.51k (x1.36)

Multithread

3580U Microsoft Surface (R) Edition

i5-7500
Test#1 (Integers)
50.44k
88.3k (x1.75)
Test#2 (FP)
94k
78.59k (x0.84)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
25.64k
19.72k (x0.77)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.11k
5.1k (x1.24)
TOTAL
174.19k
191.71k (x1.1)

Performance/W
3580U Microsoft Surface (R) Edition
i5-7500
Test#1 (Integers)
3363 points/W
1358 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
6267 points/W
1209 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1710 points/W
303 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
274 points/W
79 points/W
TOTAL
11613 points/W
2949 points/W

Performance/GHz
3580U Microsoft Surface (R) Edition
i5-7500
Test#1 (Integers)
3722 points/GHz
6734 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
6113 points/GHz
5939 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1326 points/GHz
1387 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1082 points/GHz
2125 points/GHz
TOTAL
12243 points/GHz
16186 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4