| | | | | | |

Ryzen 5 3580U Microsoft Surface (R) Edition vs Core i5-4210U


Description
The 3580U Microsoft Surface (R) Edition is based on Zen+ architecture while the i5-4210U is based on Haswell.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3580U Microsoft Surface (R) Edition gets a score of 174.2 k points while the i5-4210U gets 57.6 k points.

Summarizing, the 3580U Microsoft Surface (R) Edition is 3 times faster than the i5-4210U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
810f81
40651
Core
Picasso
Haswell
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.1 GHz
1.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.7 GHz
2.7 GHz
Socket
BGA-FP5
BGA 1169
Cores/Threads
4/8
2/4
TDP
15 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x64+4x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
3072 kB
Date
October 2019
April 2014
Mean monothread perf.
45.3k points
27.41k points
Mean multithread perf.
174.19k points
57.58k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3580U Microsoft Surface (R) Edition
i5-4210U
Test#1 (Integers)
13.77k
13.79k (x1)
Test#2 (FP)
22.62k
7.79k (x0.34)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.91k
3.11k (x0.63)
Test#1 (Memory)
4k
2.72k (x0.68)
TOTAL
45.3k
27.41k (x0.61)

Multithread

3580U Microsoft Surface (R) Edition

i5-4210U
Test#1 (Integers)
50.44k
28.78k (x0.57)
Test#2 (FP)
94k
18.99k (x0.2)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
25.64k
7.21k (x0.28)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.11k
2.6k (x0.63)
TOTAL
174.19k
57.58k (x0.33)

Performance/W
3580U Microsoft Surface (R) Edition
i5-4210U
Test#1 (Integers)
3363 points/W
1919 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
6267 points/W
1266 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1710 points/W
481 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
274 points/W
174 points/W
TOTAL
11613 points/W
3839 points/W

Performance/GHz
3580U Microsoft Surface (R) Edition
i5-4210U
Test#1 (Integers)
3722 points/GHz
5108 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
6113 points/GHz
2884 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1326 points/GHz
1150 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1082 points/GHz
1008 points/GHz
TOTAL
12243 points/GHz
10151 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4