| | | | | | |

Ryzen 5 3580U Microsoft Surface (R) Edition vs Core i3-6006U


Description
The 3580U Microsoft Surface (R) Edition is based on Zen+ architecture while the i3-6006U is based on Skylake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3580U Microsoft Surface (R) Edition gets a score of 174.2 k points while the i3-6006U gets 67.9 k points.

Summarizing, the 3580U Microsoft Surface (R) Edition is 2.6 times faster than the i3-6006U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
810f81
406e3
Core
Picasso
Skylake-U
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.1 GHz
2 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.7 GHz
2 GHz
Socket
BGA-FP5
BGA1356
Cores/Threads
4/8
2/4
TDP
15 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x64+4x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
3072 kB
Date
October 2019
November 2016
Mean monothread perf.
45.3k points
30.66k points
Mean multithread perf.
174.19k points
67.91k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3580U Microsoft Surface (R) Edition
i3-6006U
Test#1 (Integers)
13.77k
12.6k (x0.92)
Test#2 (FP)
22.62k
11.66k (x0.52)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.91k
2.71k (x0.55)
Test#1 (Memory)
4k
3.68k (x0.92)
TOTAL
45.3k
30.66k (x0.68)

Multithread

3580U Microsoft Surface (R) Edition

i3-6006U
Test#1 (Integers)
50.44k
29.56k (x0.59)
Test#2 (FP)
94k
27.74k (x0.3)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
25.64k
6.56k (x0.26)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.11k
4.06k (x0.99)
TOTAL
174.19k
67.91k (x0.39)

Performance/W
3580U Microsoft Surface (R) Edition
i3-6006U
Test#1 (Integers)
3363 points/W
1971 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
6267 points/W
1849 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1710 points/W
437 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
274 points/W
270 points/W
TOTAL
11613 points/W
4528 points/W

Performance/GHz
3580U Microsoft Surface (R) Edition
i3-6006U
Test#1 (Integers)
3722 points/GHz
6302 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
6113 points/GHz
5831 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1326 points/GHz
1355 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1082 points/GHz
1842 points/GHz
TOTAL
12243 points/GHz
15330 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4