| | | | | | |

Ryzen 5 3580U Microsoft Surface (R) Edition vs Ryzen 7 5800U


Description
The 3580U Microsoft Surface (R) Edition is based on Zen+ architecture while the 5800U is based on Zen 3.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3580U Microsoft Surface (R) Edition gets a score of 174.2 k points while the 5800U gets 314.5 k points.

Summarizing, the 5800U is 1.8 times faster than the 3580U Microsoft Surface (R) Edition. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
810f81
a50f00
Core
Picasso
Cezanne
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.1 GHz
1.9 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.7 GHz
4.4 GHz
Socket
BGA-FP5
BGA-FP6
Cores/Threads
4/8
8/16
TDP
15 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x64+4x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
16384 kB
Date
October 2019
January 2021
Mean monothread perf.
45.3k points
71.16k points
Mean multithread perf.
174.19k points
314.55k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3580U Microsoft Surface (R) Edition
5800U
Test#1 (Integers)
13.77k
18.34k (x1.33)
Test#2 (FP)
22.62k
22.78k (x1.01)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.91k
9.45k (x1.92)
Test#1 (Memory)
4k
20.59k (x5.14)
TOTAL
45.3k
71.16k (x1.57)

Multithread

3580U Microsoft Surface (R) Edition

5800U
Test#1 (Integers)
50.44k
102.74k (x2.04)
Test#2 (FP)
94k
143.27k (x1.52)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
25.64k
58.13k (x2.27)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.11k
10.41k (x2.54)
TOTAL
174.19k
314.55k (x1.81)

Performance/W
3580U Microsoft Surface (R) Edition
5800U
Test#1 (Integers)
3363 points/W
6849 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
6267 points/W
9551 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1710 points/W
3875 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
274 points/W
694 points/W
TOTAL
11613 points/W
20970 points/W

Performance/GHz
3580U Microsoft Surface (R) Edition
5800U
Test#1 (Integers)
3722 points/GHz
4168 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
6113 points/GHz
5178 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1326 points/GHz
2147 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1082 points/GHz
4679 points/GHz
TOTAL
12243 points/GHz
16172 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4