| | | | | | |

Ryzen 5 3580U Microsoft Surface (R) Edition vs Ryzen 7 4700U


Description
The 3580U Microsoft Surface (R) Edition is based on Zen+ architecture while the 4700U is based on Zen 2.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3580U Microsoft Surface (R) Edition gets a score of 174.2 k points while the 4700U gets 269.6 k points.

Summarizing, the 4700U is 1.5 times faster than the 3580U Microsoft Surface (R) Edition. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
810f81
860f01
Core
Picasso
Renoir
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.1 GHz
2 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.7 GHz
4.1 GHz
Socket
BGA-FP5
BGA-FP6
Cores/Threads
4/8
8/8
TDP
15 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x64+4x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
2x4096 kB
Date
October 2019
January 2020
Mean monothread perf.
45.3k points
49.53k points
Mean multithread perf.
174.19k points
269.56k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3580U Microsoft Surface (R) Edition
4700U
Test#1 (Integers)
13.77k
10.38k (x0.75)
Test#2 (FP)
22.62k
22.63k (x1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.91k
8.52k (x1.74)
Test#1 (Memory)
4k
7.99k (x2)
TOTAL
45.3k
49.53k (x1.09)

Multithread

3580U Microsoft Surface (R) Edition

4700U
Test#1 (Integers)
50.44k
86.74k (x1.72)
Test#2 (FP)
94k
128.69k (x1.37)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
25.64k
48.71k (x1.9)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.11k
5.41k (x1.32)
TOTAL
174.19k
269.56k (x1.55)

Performance/W
3580U Microsoft Surface (R) Edition
4700U
Test#1 (Integers)
3363 points/W
5783 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
6267 points/W
8579 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1710 points/W
3248 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
274 points/W
360 points/W
TOTAL
11613 points/W
17970 points/W

Performance/GHz
3580U Microsoft Surface (R) Edition
4700U
Test#1 (Integers)
3722 points/GHz
2533 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
6113 points/GHz
5520 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1326 points/GHz
2078 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1082 points/GHz
1949 points/GHz
TOTAL
12243 points/GHz
12080 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4