| | | | | | |

Ryzen 5 3580U Microsoft Surface (R) Edition vs Core i5-1335U


Description
The 3580U Microsoft Surface (R) Edition is based on Zen+ architecture while the i5-1335U is based on Raptor Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3580U Microsoft Surface (R) Edition gets a score of 174.2 k points while the i5-1335U gets 282.2 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-1335U is 1.6 times faster than the 3580U Microsoft Surface (R) Edition. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
810f81
b06a3
Core
Picasso
Raptor Lake-U
Architecture
Zen+
Base frecuency
2.1 GHz
1.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.7 GHz
4.6 GHz
Socket
BGA-FP5
BGA 1744
Cores/Threads
4/8
10/12
TDP
15 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x64+4x32 kB
2x32/8x64+2x48/8x32 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
2x1280/2x2048 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
12288 kB
Date
October 2019
January 2023
Mean monothread perf.
45.3k points
92.46k points
Mean multithread perf.
174.19k points
282.25k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3580U Microsoft Surface (R) Edition
i5-1335U
Test#1 (Integers)
13.77k
37.94k (x2.76)
Test#2 (FP)
22.62k
26.18k (x1.16)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.91k
13.86k (x2.82)
Test#1 (Memory)
4k
14.48k (x3.62)
TOTAL
45.3k
92.46k (x2.04)

Multithread

3580U Microsoft Surface (R) Edition

i5-1335U
Test#1 (Integers)
50.44k
125.7k (x2.49)
Test#2 (FP)
94k
93.63k (x1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
25.64k
46.18k (x1.8)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.11k
16.75k (x4.08)
TOTAL
174.19k
282.25k (x1.62)

Performance/W
3580U Microsoft Surface (R) Edition
i5-1335U
Test#1 (Integers)
3363 points/W
8380 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
6267 points/W
6242 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1710 points/W
3079 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
274 points/W
1117 points/W
TOTAL
11613 points/W
18817 points/W

Performance/GHz
3580U Microsoft Surface (R) Edition
i5-1335U
Test#1 (Integers)
3722 points/GHz
8248 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
6113 points/GHz
5692 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1326 points/GHz
3013 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1082 points/GHz
3147 points/GHz
TOTAL
12243 points/GHz
20100 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4