| | | | | | |

Ryzen 5 3580U Microsoft Surface (R) Edition vs Core i7-1185G7


Description
The 3580U Microsoft Surface (R) Edition is based on Zen+ architecture while the i7-1185G7 is based on Tiger Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3580U Microsoft Surface (R) Edition gets a score of 174.2 k points while the i7-1185G7 gets 230.9 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-1185G7 is 1.3 times faster than the 3580U Microsoft Surface (R) Edition. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
810f81
806c1
Core
Picasso
Tiger Lake UP3
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.1 GHz
3 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.7 GHz
4.8 GHz
Socket
BGA-FP5
BGA 1449
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/8
TDP
15 W
28 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x64+4x32 kB
4x32+4x48 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
4x1280 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
12288 kB
Date
October 2019
September 2020
Mean monothread perf.
45.3k points
60.87k points
Mean multithread perf.
174.19k points
230.91k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3580U Microsoft Surface (R) Edition
i7-1185G7
Test#1 (Integers)
13.77k
24.35k (x1.77)
Test#2 (FP)
22.62k
20.07k (x0.89)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.91k
8.61k (x1.75)
Test#1 (Memory)
4k
7.84k (x1.96)
TOTAL
45.3k
60.87k (x1.34)

Multithread

3580U Microsoft Surface (R) Edition

i7-1185G7
Test#1 (Integers)
50.44k
93.58k (x1.86)
Test#2 (FP)
94k
94.71k (x1.01)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
25.64k
33.28k (x1.3)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.11k
9.34k (x2.27)
TOTAL
174.19k
230.91k (x1.33)

Performance/W
3580U Microsoft Surface (R) Edition
i7-1185G7
Test#1 (Integers)
3363 points/W
3342 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
6267 points/W
3383 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1710 points/W
1189 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
274 points/W
334 points/W
TOTAL
11613 points/W
8247 points/W

Performance/GHz
3580U Microsoft Surface (R) Edition
i7-1185G7
Test#1 (Integers)
3722 points/GHz
5074 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
6113 points/GHz
4182 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1326 points/GHz
1793 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1082 points/GHz
1633 points/GHz
TOTAL
12243 points/GHz
12682 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4