Ryzen 5 7530U vs Xeon Silver 4208
Description
The 7530U is based on Zen 3 architecture while the Silver 4208 is based on Cascade Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 7530U gets a score of 171.4 k points while the Silver 4208 gets 311.6 k points.
Summarizing, the Silver 4208 is 1.8 times faster than the 7530U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 7530U gets a score of 171.4 k points while the Silver 4208 gets 311.6 k points.
Summarizing, the Silver 4208 is 1.8 times faster than the 7530U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a50f00
50657
Core
Barcelo-R
Cascade Lake-SP
Base frecuency
2 GHz
2.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.5 GHz
3.2 GHz
Socket
BGA-FP6
LGA 3647
Cores/Threads
6/12
8/16
TDP
15 W
85 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
6x512 kB
8x1024 kB
Cache L3
16384 kB
11264 kB
Date
January 2023
April 2019
Mean monothread perf.
31.96k points
38.61k points
Mean multithread perf.
171.39k points
311.57k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
7530U
Silver 4208
Test#1 (Integers)
8.81k
16.86k (x1.91)
Test#2 (FP)
10.18k
12.08k (x1.19)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.31k
3.37k (x0.78)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.66k
6.29k (x0.73)
TOTAL
31.96k
38.61k (x1.21)
Multithread
7530U
Silver 4208
Test#1 (Integers)
55.98k
150.99k (x2.7)
Test#2 (FP)
76k
118.54k (x1.56)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
34.38k
33.44k (x0.97)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.04k
8.6k (x1.71)
TOTAL
171.39k
311.57k (x1.82)
Performance/W
7530U
Silver 4208
Test#1 (Integers)
3732 points/W
1776 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
5066 points/W
1395 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2292 points/W
393 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
336 points/W
101 points/W
TOTAL
11426 points/W
3666 points/W
Performance/GHz
7530U
Silver 4208
Test#1 (Integers)
1957 points/GHz
5269 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2262 points/GHz
3776 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
959 points/GHz
1054 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1925 points/GHz
1966 points/GHz
TOTAL
7103 points/GHz
12065 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4