Ryzen 5 7530U vs Xeon E5-2680 v3
Description
The 7530U is based on Zen 3 architecture while the E5-2680 v3 is based on Haswell.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 7530U gets a score of 171.4 k points while the E5-2680 v3 gets 426.6 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2680 v3 is 2.5 times faster than the 7530U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 7530U gets a score of 171.4 k points while the E5-2680 v3 gets 426.6 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2680 v3 is 2.5 times faster than the 7530U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a50f00
306f2
Core
Barcelo-R
Haswell-EP
Base frecuency
2 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.5 GHz
3.3 GHz
Socket
BGA-FP6
LGA 2011-3
Cores/Threads
6/12
12/24
TDP
15 W
120 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
12x32+12x32 kB
Cache L2
6x512 kB
12x256 kB
Cache L3
16384 kB
30720 kB
Date
January 2023
September 2014
Mean monothread perf.
31.96k points
36.31k points
Mean multithread perf.
171.39k points
426.58k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
7530U
E5-2680 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
8.81k
18.86k (x2.14)
Test#2 (FP)
10.18k
10.06k (x0.99)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.31k
4.14k (x0.96)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.66k
3.24k (x0.37)
TOTAL
31.96k
36.31k (x1.14)
Multithread
7530U
E5-2680 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
55.98k
218.93k (x3.91)
Test#2 (FP)
76k
139.75k (x1.84)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
34.38k
55.47k (x1.61)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.04k
12.42k (x2.46)
TOTAL
171.39k
426.58k (x2.49)
Performance/W
7530U
E5-2680 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
3732 points/W
1824 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
5066 points/W
1165 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2292 points/W
462 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
336 points/W
103 points/W
TOTAL
11426 points/W
3555 points/W
Performance/GHz
7530U
E5-2680 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
1957 points/GHz
5716 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2262 points/GHz
3049 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
959 points/GHz
1254 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1925 points/GHz
983 points/GHz
TOTAL
7103 points/GHz
11002 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4