Ryzen 5 7530U vs Core i9-10900X
Description
The 7530U is based on Zen 3 architecture while the i9-10900X is based on Cascade Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 7530U gets a score of 171.4 k points while the i9-10900X gets 632.4 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-10900X is 3.7 times faster than the 7530U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 7530U gets a score of 171.4 k points while the i9-10900X gets 632.4 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-10900X is 3.7 times faster than the 7530U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a50f00
50657
Core
Barcelo-R
Cascade Lake-X
Base frecuency
2 GHz
3.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.5 GHz
4.7 GHz
Socket
BGA-FP6
LGA 2066
Cores/Threads
6/12
10/20
TDP
15 W
165 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
10x32+10x32 kB
Cache L2
6x512 kB
10x1024 kB
Cache L3
16384 kB
19712 kB
Date
January 2023
November 2019
Mean monothread perf.
31.96k points
62.28k points
Mean multithread perf.
171.39k points
632.35k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
7530U
i9-10900X
Test#1 (Integers)
8.81k
25.97k (x2.95)
Test#2 (FP)
10.18k
22.37k (x2.2)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.31k
5.3k (x1.23)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.66k
8.63k (x1)
TOTAL
31.96k
62.28k (x1.95)
Multithread
7530U
i9-10900X
Test#1 (Integers)
55.98k
281.98k (x5.04)
Test#2 (FP)
76k
259.01k (x3.41)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
34.38k
64.87k (x1.89)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.04k
26.5k (x5.26)
TOTAL
171.39k
632.35k (x3.69)
Performance/W
7530U
i9-10900X
Test#1 (Integers)
3732 points/W
1709 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
5066 points/W
1570 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2292 points/W
393 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
336 points/W
161 points/W
TOTAL
11426 points/W
3832 points/W
Performance/GHz
7530U
i9-10900X
Test#1 (Integers)
1957 points/GHz
5526 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2262 points/GHz
4760 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
959 points/GHz
1128 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1925 points/GHz
1835 points/GHz
TOTAL
7103 points/GHz
13250 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4