| | | | | | |

Ryzen 5 7530U vs Core i7-4702MQ


Description
The 7530U is based on Zen 3 architecture while the i7-4702MQ is based on Haswell.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 7530U gets a score of 171.4 k points while the i7-4702MQ gets 145.1 k points.

Summarizing, the 7530U is 1.2 times faster than the i7-4702MQ . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a50f00
306c3
Core
Barcelo-R
Haswell
Architecture
Base frecuency
2 GHz
2.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.5 GHz
3.2 GHz
Socket
BGA-FP6
Socket G3
Cores/Threads
6/12
4 /8
TDP
15 W
37 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
6x512 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
16384 kB
8192 kB
Date
January 2023
May 2013
Mean monothread perf.
31.96k points
36.8k points
Mean multithread perf.
171.39k points
145.15k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
7530U
i7-4702MQ
Test#1 (Integers)
8.81k
18.98k (x2.16)
Test#2 (FP)
10.18k
9.5k (x0.93)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.31k
4.32k (x1)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.66k
3.99k (x0.46)
TOTAL
31.96k
36.8k (x1.15)

Multithread

7530U

i7-4702MQ
Test#1 (Integers)
55.98k
74.75k (x1.34)
Test#2 (FP)
76k
47.72k (x0.63)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
34.38k
19.65k (x0.57)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.04k
3.02k (x0.6)
TOTAL
171.39k
145.15k (x0.85)

Performance/W
7530U
i7-4702MQ
Test#1 (Integers)
3732 points/W
2020 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
5066 points/W
1290 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2292 points/W
531 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
336 points/W
82 points/W
TOTAL
11426 points/W
3923 points/W

Performance/GHz
7530U
i7-4702MQ
Test#1 (Integers)
1957 points/GHz
5932 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2262 points/GHz
2968 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
959 points/GHz
1351 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1925 points/GHz
1248 points/GHz
TOTAL
7103 points/GHz
11499 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4