Ryzen 5 7530U vs Core i7-10750H
Description
The 7530U is based on Zen 3 architecture while the i7-10750H is based on Comet Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 7530U gets a score of 171.4 k points while the i7-10750H gets 345.7 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-10750H is 2 times faster than the 7530U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 7530U gets a score of 171.4 k points while the i7-10750H gets 345.7 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-10750H is 2 times faster than the 7530U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a50f00
a0652
Core
Barcelo-R
Comet Lake-H
Base frecuency
2 GHz
2.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.5 GHz
5 GHz
Socket
BGA-FP6
BGA 1440
Cores/Threads
6/12
6/12
TDP
15 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
6x512 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
16384 kB
12288 kB
Date
January 2023
April 2020
Mean monothread perf.
31.96k points
74.6k points
Mean multithread perf.
171.39k points
345.73k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
7530U
i7-10750H
Test#1 (Integers)
8.81k
28.66k (x3.25)
Test#2 (FP)
10.18k
26.2k (x2.57)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.31k
6.14k (x1.42)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.66k
13.59k (x1.57)
TOTAL
31.96k
74.6k (x2.33)
Multithread
7530U
i7-10750H
Test#1 (Integers)
55.98k
152.33k (x2.72)
Test#2 (FP)
76k
150.28k (x1.98)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
34.38k
36.1k (x1.05)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.04k
7.02k (x1.39)
TOTAL
171.39k
345.73k (x2.02)
Performance/W
7530U
i7-10750H
Test#1 (Integers)
3732 points/W
3385 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
5066 points/W
3339 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2292 points/W
802 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
336 points/W
156 points/W
TOTAL
11426 points/W
7683 points/W
Performance/GHz
7530U
i7-10750H
Test#1 (Integers)
1957 points/GHz
5733 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2262 points/GHz
5240 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
959 points/GHz
1228 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1925 points/GHz
2718 points/GHz
TOTAL
7103 points/GHz
14919 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4