| | | | | | |

Ryzen 5 7530U vs Core i5-9600KF


Description
The 7530U is based on Zen 3 architecture while the i5-9600KF is based on Coffee Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 7530U gets a score of 171.4 k points while the i5-9600KF gets 371.1 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-9600KF is 2.2 times faster than the 7530U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a50f00
906ec
Core
Barcelo-R
Coffee Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
2 GHz
3.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.5 GHz
4.6 GHz
Socket
BGA-FP6
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
6/12
6/6
TDP
15 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
6x512 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
16384 kB
9216 kB
Date
January 2023
January 2019
Mean monothread perf.
31.96k points
77.34k points
Mean multithread perf.
171.39k points
371.08k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
7530U
i5-9600KF
Test#1 (Integers)
8.81k
30.52k (x3.47)
Test#2 (FP)
10.18k
26.54k (x2.61)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.31k
6.41k (x1.49)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.66k
13.87k (x1.6)
TOTAL
31.96k
77.34k (x2.42)

Multithread

7530U

i5-9600KF
Test#1 (Integers)
55.98k
174.66k (x3.12)
Test#2 (FP)
76k
154.06k (x2.03)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
34.38k
34.11k (x0.99)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.04k
8.24k (x1.64)
TOTAL
171.39k
371.08k (x2.17)

Performance/W
7530U
i5-9600KF
Test#1 (Integers)
3732 points/W
1839 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
5066 points/W
1622 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2292 points/W
359 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
336 points/W
87 points/W
TOTAL
11426 points/W
3906 points/W

Performance/GHz
7530U
i5-9600KF
Test#1 (Integers)
1957 points/GHz
6635 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2262 points/GHz
5769 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
959 points/GHz
1394 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1925 points/GHz
3015 points/GHz
TOTAL
7103 points/GHz
16813 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4