| | | | | | |

Ryzen 5 7530U vs Core i5-9500


Description
The 7530U is based on Zen 3 architecture while the i5-9500 is based on Coffee Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 7530U gets a score of 171.4 k points while the i5-9500 gets 352.8 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-9500 is 2.1 times faster than the 7530U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a50f00
906ea
Core
Barcelo-R
Coffee Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
2 GHz
3 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.5 GHz
4.4 GHz
Socket
BGA-FP6
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
6/12
6/6
TDP
15 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
6x512 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
16384 kB
9216 kB
Date
January 2023
April 2019
Mean monothread perf.
31.96k points
73.65k points
Mean multithread perf.
171.39k points
352.84k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
7530U
i5-9500
Test#1 (Integers)
8.81k
29.17k (x3.31)
Test#2 (FP)
10.18k
25.49k (x2.5)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.31k
5.84k (x1.35)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.66k
13.15k (x1.52)
TOTAL
31.96k
73.65k (x2.3)

Multithread

7530U

i5-9500
Test#1 (Integers)
55.98k
166.66k (x2.98)
Test#2 (FP)
76k
146.9k (x1.93)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
34.38k
34.04k (x0.99)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.04k
5.25k (x1.04)
TOTAL
171.39k
352.84k (x2.06)

Performance/W
7530U
i5-9500
Test#1 (Integers)
3732 points/W
2564 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
5066 points/W
2260 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2292 points/W
524 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
336 points/W
81 points/W
TOTAL
11426 points/W
5428 points/W

Performance/GHz
7530U
i5-9500
Test#1 (Integers)
1957 points/GHz
6629 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2262 points/GHz
5793 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
959 points/GHz
1327 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1925 points/GHz
2990 points/GHz
TOTAL
7103 points/GHz
16739 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4