| | | | | | |

Ryzen 5 7530U vs Core i5-7500


Description
The 7530U is based on Zen 3 architecture while the i5-7500 is based on Kaby Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 7530U gets a score of 171.4 k points while the i5-7500 gets 191.7 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-7500 is 1.1 times faster than the 7530U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a50f00
906e9
Core
Barcelo-R
Kaby Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
2 GHz
3.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.5 GHz
3.8 GHz
Socket
BGA-FP6
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
6/12
4/4
TDP
15 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
32+32 kB
Cache L2
6x512 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
16384 kB
6144 kB
Date
January 2023
September 2016
Mean monothread perf.
31.96k points
61.51k points
Mean multithread perf.
171.39k points
191.71k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
7530U
i5-7500
Test#1 (Integers)
8.81k
25.59k (x2.91)
Test#2 (FP)
10.18k
22.57k (x2.22)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.31k
5.27k (x1.22)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.66k
8.08k (x0.93)
TOTAL
31.96k
61.51k (x1.92)

Multithread

7530U

i5-7500
Test#1 (Integers)
55.98k
88.3k (x1.58)
Test#2 (FP)
76k
78.59k (x1.03)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
34.38k
19.72k (x0.57)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.04k
5.1k (x1.01)
TOTAL
171.39k
191.71k (x1.12)

Performance/W
7530U
i5-7500
Test#1 (Integers)
3732 points/W
1358 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
5066 points/W
1209 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2292 points/W
303 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
336 points/W
79 points/W
TOTAL
11426 points/W
2949 points/W

Performance/GHz
7530U
i5-7500
Test#1 (Integers)
1957 points/GHz
6734 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2262 points/GHz
5939 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
959 points/GHz
1387 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1925 points/GHz
2125 points/GHz
TOTAL
7103 points/GHz
16186 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4